期刊文献+

β受体阻滞剂服用史与急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流的相关性 被引量:12

The impact of pre-primary percutaneous coronary intervention β blocker use on the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者既往服用β受体阻滞剂与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后发生无复流的相关性.方法 入选北京安贞医院和解放军总医院2007年1月至2011年6月入院的发病12 h内行PCI的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者1 615例进行回顾性分析.将患者分为β受体阻滞剂组(入院前服用β受体阻滞剂≥1个月,共257例)和非β受体阻滞剂组(入院前服用β受体阻滞剂<1个月或未服用β受体阻滞剂,共1 358例).无复流定义为置入支架后最后一帧冠状动脉影像的血流TIMI分级<3级.采用多因素logistic回归分析直接PCI后无复流的独立危险因素.结果 β受体阻滞剂组患者直接PCI后无复流的发生率低于非β受体阻滞剂组[13.6% (35/257)比21.2%(289/1 358),P=0.017].多因素logistic回归分析显示,入院前服用β受体阻滞剂(OR =0.594,95%CI:0.394~0.893,P=0.012)是直接PCI后发生无复流的保护因素,年龄≥55岁(OR=2.734,95%CI:1.959 ~ 3.817,P<0.001)、中性粒细胞计数(OR=1.257,95% CI:1.169 ~1.351,P<0.001)、入院时血糖水平(OR=1.060,95%CI:1.018 ~1.103,P=0.004)、术前心功能Ⅳ级(Killip分级)(OR=3.383,95%CI:1.924 ~5.948,P<0.001)、再灌注时间≥4h(OR=1.503,95% CI:1.124 ~2.009,P=0.006)是直接PCI后发生无复流的独立危险因素.结论 长期服用β受体阻滞剂与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接PCI后无复流的发生率降低有关. Objective To investigate the impact of pre-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) β blocker use on the development of no-reflow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients post PCI.Methods We retrospectively evaluated 1 615 outpatients with STEMI who underwent primary primary PCI with in 12 hours from symptom onset admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital and Chinese people's liberation army general hospital from January 2007 to June 2011.The study population was divided into the following 2 groups:β blocker group (pretreatment with β blockers ≥ one month before admission,n =257) and non-β blockers group (pretreatment with β blockers 〈 one month before admission or had no β blocker,n =1 358).No-reflow was defined as TIMI grade 〈 3 in last imaging of coronary artery after stenting.Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors for the no-reflow after primary PCI.Results Incidence of the no-reflow was significantly lower in the β blocker group than in non-β blockers group (13.6% (35/257) vs.21.2% (289/1 358),P =0.017).Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-PCI β blocker use was a protective predictor of the no-reflow (OR =0.594,95% CI:0.394-0.893,P =0.012),while age ≥ 55 years old (OR =2.734,95% CI:1.959-3.817,P 〈 0.001),high neutrophil count (OR =1.257,95% CI:1.169-1.351,P 〈 0.001),admission plasma glucose (OR =1.060,95% CI:1.018-1.103,P =0.004),Killip classes Ⅳ (OR =3.383,95% CI:1.924-5.948,P 〈 0.001) and reperfusion time ≥ 4 h (OR =1.503,95% CI:1.124-2.009,P =0.006) were risk factors for the development of no-reflow post PCI.Conclusion Previous long term β blockers use before STEMI is associated with lower incidence of no-reflow in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期822-826,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基金 北京市科委科技支撑项目(Z121107001012002)
关键词 心肌梗死 肾上腺素能Β受体阻滞剂 无复流现象 Myocardial infarction Adrenergic beta-antagonists No-reflow phenomenon
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials[J].Lancet,2003,361:13-20.
  • 2Gibson CM,Cannon CP,Murphy SA,et al.Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades,flow grades,frame count,and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction[J].Circulation,2002,105:1909-1913.
  • 3Rezkalla SH,Kloner RA.Coronary no-reflow phenomenon:from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2008,72:950-957.
  • 4Reffelmann T,Kloner RA.The “no-reflow” phenomenon:basic science and clinical correlates[J].Heart,2002,87:162-168.
  • 5Sharma SK,Dangas G,Mehran R,et al.Risk factors for the development of slow flow during rotational coronary atherectomy[J].Am J Cardiol,1997,80:219-222.
  • 6Niccoli G,Burzotta F,Galiuto L,et al.Myocardial no-reflow in humans[J].J Am Coil Cardiol,2009,54:281-92.
  • 7Cohen M,Rentrop KP.Limitation of myocardial ischemia by collateral circulation during sudden controlled coronary artery occlusion in human subjects:a prospective study[J].Circulation,1986,74:469-476.
  • 8Gibson CM,de Lemos JA,Murphy SA,et al.Combination therapy with abciximab reduces angiographically evident thrombus in acute myocardial infarction:a TIMI 14 substudy[J].Circulation,2001,103:2550-2554.
  • 9Reffelmann T, Kloner RA. The " no-reflow" phenomenon : basic science and clinical correlates [ J ]. Heart, 2002,87 : 162-168.
  • 10Ndrepepa G,Tiroch K,Keta D,et al.Predictive factors and impact of no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2010,3:27-33.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Reffelmann T, Kloner RA. The“no-reflow”phenomenon: Basic science and clinical correlates [J]. Heart, 2002,87(2):162 - 168.
  • 2Brunvand H, Frlyland L, Hexeberg E, et al. Carvedilol improves function and reduces infarct size in the feline myocardium by protecting against lethal reperfusion injury[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 1996,314(1-2) :99 - 107.
  • 3Babbitt DG, Virmani R, Forman MB. Intracoronary adenosine administered after reperfusion limits vascular injury after prolonged ischemia in the canine model[J].Circulation, 1989, 80(5):1388-1399.
  • 4Asanuma H, Minamino T, Sanada S, et al. Beta-adrenoceptor blocker carvedilol provides cardioprotection via an adenosine-dependent mechanism in ischemic canine hearts [J]. Circulation, 2004, 109(22):2773-2779.
  • 5Feuerstein GZ, Yue TL, Cheng HY, et al. Myocardial protection by the novel vasodilating beta-blocker, carvedilol : Potential relevance of anti-oxidant activity[J]. J Hypertens, Suppl, 1993,11 (4) : S41 -S48.
  • 6Schwarz ER, Kersting PH, Reffelmann T, et al. Cardioprotection by Carvedilol : Antiapoptosis is independent of beta-adrenoceptor blockage in the rat heart[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther, 2003,8(3) :207 - 215.
  • 7Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the no-reflow'phenomenon : A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in perfused anterior wall myocardial infarction [J].Circulation,1996,93:223 - 228.
  • 8Yang Y, Tang Y, Ruan Y, et al. Comparison of metoprolol with low, middle and high doses of carvedilol in prevention of postinfarction left ventricular remodeling in rats [J]. Jpn Heart J, 2003, 44(6) :979 -988.
  • 9Giugliano D, Marfella R, Acampora R, et al. Effects of perindopril and carvedilol on endothelium-dependent vascular functions in patients with diabetes and hypertension [J]. Diabetes Care, 1998,21(4) :631 -636.
  • 10Bril A, Slivjak M, DiMartino M J, et al. Cardioprotective effects of carvedilol, a novel beta adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties, in anaesthetised minipigs: Comparison with propranolol[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 1992,26(5) :518 -525.

共引文献1

同被引文献101

引证文献12

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部