期刊文献+

经肛门瘘口引流治疗中低位直肠癌保肛术后吻合口瘘 被引量:2

Transanal drainage in treatment of anastomotic leakage after anuspreserving resection for mid/lower rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经肛门瘘口引流治疗中低位直肠癌保肛术后发生吻合口瘘临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月―2013年10月间21例中低位直肠癌保肛术后发生吻合口瘘患者的临床资料,其中采用经肛门吻合口瘘口引流9例(观察组),单纯腹腔引流管冲洗引流12例(对照组),比较两组患者的相关临床指标。结果:两组患者均痊愈出院;观察组无1例须行肠造瘘,对照组有2例保守治疗效果不佳,行肠造瘘,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.122);总的住院时间两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.061),但瘘后的住院时间及医疗费用上观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.012,P=0.031)。随访2个月至3年,患者术后便秘、腹泻、肛门不适感等症状发生率两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.066)。结论:经肛门吻合口瘘口置管引流术可作为中低位直肠癌患者保肛术后吻合口瘘重要的治疗措施,具有缩短瘘后住院时间、降低住院费用、易于接受等优点。 Objective: To assess the clinical value of transanal drainage in treatment of anastomotic leakage after anus- preserving resection for mid/lower rectal cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 21 patients developing anastomotic leakage after anus-preserving resection for mid/lower rectal cancer from January 2010 to October 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 9 cases received transanal drainage (observational group), and 12 cases underwent abdominal drainage tube irrigation only (control group), and the associated clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients in the two groups recovered and were discharged from the hospital. None of the patients in observational group required a colostomy, but 2 cases in control group underwent colostomy attributed to conservative treatment failure, however, the difference did not reach a statistical significance (P=0.122). The difference in total length of hospital stay between the two groups had no statistical significance (P=0.061), but thelength of post-fistula hospital stay and hospitalization cost in observational group were lower than those in control group, and the differences had statistical significance (P=0.012, P=0.031). Follow-up was conducted for 2 months to 3 years, and no sta[istical difference was noted between the two groups in incidence of postoperative symptoms such as constipation, diarrhea, anal discomfort (P=0.066). Conclusion: Transanal drainage can be used as an important method for treatment of anastomotic leakage after anus-preserving resection for mid/lower rectal cancer, which has the advantages of shortening the length of post- fistula hospital stay, reducing hospitalization cost, and high patients' acceptance.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期1390-1393,共4页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 直肠肿瘤/外科学 外科吻合口 Rectal Neoplasms/surg Surgical Stomas Fistula
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1周总光,王自强.欧美与日本中低位直肠癌诊治指南解读[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(4):291-292. 被引量:70
  • 2Heald R J, Moran B J, Ryall BD, et at. Rectal cancer: the Basingstnke experience of total mesnrectal excisinn, 1978-1997[.1]. Arch Surg, 1998, 133(8):894-899.
  • 3Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Beam P, et al. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum[J]. Br J Surg, 1994, 81(8):1224-1226.
  • 4Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, et al. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients[J]. World J Surg, 2002,26(4):499-502.
  • 5Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, et al. Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study[J]. Int J Colnreetal Dis, 2008, 23(3):265-270.
  • 6Volk A, Kersting S, Held HC, et al. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after single-layer continuous suture for ilencolonie anastomosis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011, 26(3):321-327.
  • 7Thornton M, Joshi H, Vimalachandran C, et el. Management and outcome of colorectal anastomotic leaks[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011, 26(3):313-320.
  • 8Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intraeorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer[J] Am J Surg, 2011,202(3):259-264.
  • 9Koperna T. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking[J]. Arch Surg, 2003, 138(12):1334-1338.
  • 10Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotie leakage in colorectal surgery[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48(5):1021-1026.

共引文献69

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部