期刊文献+

单管巢式实时PCR检测麻风杆菌方法的建立及初步应用 被引量:2

Establishment and preliminary application of single-tube nested realtime PCR in detecting Mycobacterium leprae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:明确单管巢式实时 PCR 检测麻风杆菌的特异性、灵敏性和重复性。方法:以麻风杆菌 hsp18基因为靶基因设计引物和探针,建立单管巢式实时 PCR 方法检测麻风杆菌并与抗酸染色及普通 PCR 进行特异性和灵敏性的比较。结果:单管巢式实时 PCR 检测下限为2.1 fg 质粒 DNA,普通PCR 为21 fg 质粒 DNA,敏感性高10倍;与8种非麻风杆菌无交叉反应;批内相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.24%~1.08%,批间 RSD 为0.09%~2.8%。对比检测54例麻风疑似标本中,抗酸染色、普通 PCR 和单管巢式实时 PCR 的敏感性分别为81.3%(26/32)、87.5%(28/32)和96.9%(31/32)。结论:单管巢式实时 PCR 特异性强、敏感性高且重复性好。 Objective: To detect the sensitivity of single-tube nested realtime PCR in detecting Mycobacte-rium leprae. Methods: The primers and probe were designed based on the hsp18 gene of Mycobacterium lep-rae. The single-tube nested realtime PCR was established and the sensitivity and specificity were compared with acid-fast staining and ordinary PCR. Results: The sensitivity of the single-tube nested realtime PCR for detecting Mycobacterium leprae was 2.1fg of plasmid DNA, which was 10 times more sensitive than that in the normal PCR. There was non-cross reactivity with other 8 Non-Mycobacterium leprae. Intra relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.24%-1.08% and inter RSD was 0.09% -2.8%. The sensitivity of acid-fast staining, normal and single-tube nested PCR in detecting 54 suspected samples of leprosy was 81.3% (26/ 32), 87.5%(28/ 32) and 96.9% (31/ 32), respectively. Conclusion: The single-tube nested realtime PCR method in detecting Mycobacterium leprae is more sensitive and specific.
出处 《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》 2014年第10期579-582,共4页 China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases
关键词 麻风杆菌 单管巢式实时PCR hsp18 Mycobacterium leprae single-tube nested realtime PCR hsp18
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Britton WJ, Lockwood DN. Leprosy. Lancet, 2004,363 (9416) : 1209-1219.
  • 2Naafs B. Viewpoint: leprosy after the year 2000. Trop Med Int Health, 2000,5 (6) : 400-403.
  • 3Williams DL, Gillis TP, Booth RJ, et al. The use of a specific DNA probe and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae. J Infect Dis, 1990,162(1) : 193-200.
  • 4Kramme S, Bretzel G, Panning M, et al. Detection and quantifi- cation of Mycobacterium leprae in tissue samples by real-time PCR. Med Microbiol Immunol, 2004,193 (4) : 189-193.
  • 5温艳,邢燕,袁联潮,刘健,陈小华,张颖,李桓英.用巢式聚合酶链式反应从全血扩增麻风菌特异片段提高麻风病确诊率[J].中国预防医学杂志,2011,12(5):415-418. 被引量:3
  • 6Martinez AN, Britto CF, Nery JA, et al. Evaluation of real time and conventional PCR targeting complex 85 genes for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin biopsy samples from patients diagnosed with leprosy. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44 (9) : 3154-3159.
  • 7Cox RA, Kempsell K, Fairclough L, et al. The 16S ribosomal RNA of Mycobacterium leprae contains a unique sequence which can be used for identification by the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Microbiol, 1991,35(5) :254-290.
  • 8Donoghue HD, Holton J, Spigelman M. PCR primers that can detect low levels of Mycobacterium leprae DNA. J Med Microbiol,2001,50(2) : 177-182.
  • 9温艳,谷俊朝.PCR技术检测麻风分枝杆菌进展[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2012,26(9):838-840. 被引量:3
  • 10Chae GT, Kim MJ, Kang TJ, et al. DNA-PCR and RT-PCR for the 18-kDa gene of Mycobacterium leprae to assess the effi- cacy of multidrug therapy for leprosy. J Med Microbiol, 2002,51 (5) :417-422.

二级参考文献27

  • 1王红斌,翁小满,温艳,李桓英.巢式聚合酶链反应检测麻风菌利福平耐药基因的研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(10):1015-1017. 被引量:5
  • 2Plikaytis BB, Gelber RH, Shinnick TM. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium leprae using a nested primer gene am- plification assay [J].J Clin Mierobiol, 1990, 28 (9):1913- 1917.
  • 3Kaur I, Kaur S, Sharma VK, et al. Bacillaemia and mycobacterium leprae cell wall antigen in paucibacillary leprosy [J]. Indian J Lepr, 1993, 65 (3): 283 -288.
  • 4Agusni, Cita RP, Dinar A, et al. Detection of MLeprae in the blood of leprosy patients and healthy inhabitants live in endemic leprosy area [R].Linda: Report of 17th international leprosy congress, 2008.
  • 5Hartskeerl RA, De Wit ML, Klatser PR. Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae [J]. J Gen Microbioi, 1989, 135:2357 -2364.
  • 6Oskam L, Slim E, Buhrer Sekula S. Serology: recent developments, strengths, limitations and prospects: a state of the art overview[J].Lepr Rev, 2003, 74 (3): 196 -205.
  • 7Woods SA, Cole ST. A rapid method for the detection of potentially viable Mycobacterium leprae in human biopsies; a nove application of PCR [J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 1989, 65 (3): 305 -310.
  • 8Oskam L, Slim E, Buhrer-Sekula S. Serology: recentdevelopments, strengths, limitations and prospects: a state of the art overview[J]. Lepr Rev, 2001,74(3) : 196-205.
  • 9Lyamuya E, Bredberg-Raden U, Massawe A, et al. Performance of a modified HIV-I p24 antigen assay for early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in infants and prediction of mother- to-infant transmission of HIV-1 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania[J]. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol, 1996,12(4) :421- 426.
  • 10Seremba E, Ocama P, Opio C K, et al. Poor performance of hepatitis C antibody tests in hospital patients in Uganda[J]. J Med Virol, 2010,82(8): 1371-1378.

共引文献5

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部