论海德格尔早期思想的“界限”

Analysis on the Contributions and Limitations in Martin Heidegger's Thought at His Primary Stage

海德格尔对他人、社会集体及其历史实践活动的确关注不够,但是在突破了主客二元分立的意义上,他的思想可被看作是原初地具有实践意蕴的;海德格尔所谓的"实际性"的确有过于形式化和抽离了一切具体伦理道德内容的嫌疑,但是在他这里,可以说有一种"元伦理学";海德格尔对身体和非人存在者问题的有意忽略,并不是一个严重的错误,因为这个问题只有基于对缘在的原初理解才可以得到恰切的处理;海德格尔的思维方式和表达方式的确具有独白和专断的性质,但是在让每个人自由地选择自身的可能性这个意义上,它们可以说在一个更深的层次上是"对话的"。海德格尔早期思想的这些"界限"的存在一方面内在地使得海德格尔成为了他自己,另一方面表明了他的内在缺陷和不足。

Heidegger has made a significant breakthrough in the dualism of subjects and objects, and his ideas are of originally practical implications, though he didn't pay enough attention to the others, social collectivity as well as historical practical activities. It has been pointed out that his so-called factivity is highly formalized and intangible, but in his theory contains a meta-ethics. It is not a serious error that Heidegger intentionally neglected body and non-beings; instead, there is more to him than that. When we criticize him for his arbitrary & monologue-like ways of thinking and expression, the important concept we will study is what dialogue means. The demarcations of his early thoughts manifest his immanent prescription as well as his intrinsic defect and deficiency.