期刊文献+

范畴化理论的演进 被引量:1

A study of the definitions and implications of categorization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 范畴化是语言学界,乃至哲学界和心理学界一直关注和研究的问题。范畴化理论的不断更新也对语言研究的范式产生了诸多影响。国外的范畴化理论较多,而国内相关研究较少;让更多语言研究者了解各种范畴化理论,并为汉语研究服务,这是本文翻译的初衷。总的说来,范畴化研究经历了传统观点、传统观点批判、梯度结构批判和范畴理论等4个阶段。随着认知科学和语言学的发展,以事件为基础的新范畴化阶段已经出现。文章逐一介绍了不同的范畴化理论的核心观点、存在的问题以及对其批判,并对后续研究进行了展望。 Categorization is a interdisciplinary research focus, whose research findings have promoted further studies in the relevant fields of linguistics, philosophy and psychology. The study on categorization has gone roughly through four phases: classical categorization, challenges to the classical view, graded structure critique and categories as theories. Along with the development of cognitive science and linguistics; the newly event-based phase of the study on categorization has been underway. This paper introduces previous categorization theories and attempts to provide insights for future researches.
机构地区 武汉大学文学院
出处 《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》 2014年第6期68-74,共7页 Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)
关键词 范畴化 传统观点 原型 梯度结构批判 理论之理论 事件 categorization classic view prototype graded structure critique theory-theory event
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Dominiek Sandra. Jan-Ola Ostman, Jef Verschueren. Cognition and Pragmatics[M]. Amsterdam: John Ben- jamins Publishing Company, 2009.
  • 2Brunet J. S. , J. J. Goodnow: G. A: Austin. A study of thinking[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley Sons,Inc. , 1956.
  • 3Berlin B. & P. Kay.. Basic color terms:their univer- sality and evolution[M]. Berkeley and Los Angel- es: University of California Press, 1969.
  • 4Roach E. Natural categories[J]. Cognitive psychol- ogy, 1973, (4).
  • 5Kahneman D. , P. Slovic & A. Tversky. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases[M]. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • 6Lakon G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind[M]. Chicago: Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 7Rosch E., C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson& P. Boyes-Braem. Basic objects in natural categories[J]. Cognitive psychology, 1976, (8).
  • 8Markman E. M.. Categorization and naming in chil- dren[M]. Boston:MIT Press, 1989.
  • 9Nunes R.& W. J.. Freeman. Reclaiming cognition: the primacy of action, intention and emotion[M]. Thorverton: Imprint Academic, 1999.
  • 10Osherson D. N, & E. E. Smith.. On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts[J]. Cogni- tion, 1981, (9).

同被引文献12

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量:712
  • 2朱永生.名词化、动词化与语法隐喻[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(2):83-90. 被引量:341
  • 3程琪龙.认知语言学概论[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001..
  • 4Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chica- go: University of Chicago Press, 1980 : 26.
  • 5Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things [M]. Chica- go : University of Chicago Press, 1987 : 56.
  • 6Langacker, Ronald W. Reference-point Constructions [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993(4) : 1-38.
  • 7Radden G, Kovecses Z. Towards a Theory of Metonymy [M]// Panther, Radden. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Am- sterdam : John Benjamins, 1999.
  • 8柬定芳.语言研究的语用和认知视角:贺徐盛桓先生70华诞[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2008:78.
  • 9Lakoff G, Turner M. More Than Cool Reason [M]. Chica- go: University of Chicago Press, 1989 : 106.
  • 10Quirk R, Crystal D. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [J].新东方英语:大学版,1985,69(2):13—16.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部