期刊文献+

从国际服务贸易摩擦透视自由化谈判的利益差异——兼论中国服务贸易发展的战略选择 被引量:6

A Study on the Interests Differences of Liberalization Negotiations through International Service Trade Frictions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在对国际服务贸易摩擦的表征与内涵进行提炼的基础上,解析与透视服务贸易自由化谈判的利益差异。结论是:美国、欧盟等发达国家在服务业市场准入谈判中的利益趋同性更强,偏重于推动金融服务、信息服务等知识密集型服务业的市场准入,这种利益取向的差异正是造成国际服务贸易摩擦的重要成因;以中国为代表的发展中国家则偏向于紧急保障机制、自然人流动等议题的谈判,这些矛盾势必会造成服务贸易自由化谈判的僵化。针对以上论述,本文最后提出对中国服务贸易发展战略的政策性启示。 This paper analyzes and discusses the interests differences of service trade liberalization negotiations.The paper finds that interests convergence is strengthened in negotiations of service market access among developed countries such as U.S.and EU,who have actively promoted the market access of knowledge-intensive services such as financial services and information services.This interests-oriented difference is the significant factor causing international service trade frictions.China,as well as other developing countries have preferred to the negotiations of emergency safeguard mechanism and presence of natural person.These differences would result in the stagnation of service trade liberalization negotiations.Considering above discussions,this paper raises useful suggestions for the strategies of China's service trade developments.
出处 《亚太经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期44-48,共5页 Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"要素成本上升背景下我国外贸中长期发展趋势研究"(13JZD010)的资助
关键词 服务贸易摩擦 服务贸易自由化谈判 利益取向 Service Trade Frictions Service Trade Liberalization Negotiation Interests Orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

共引文献2

同被引文献78

  • 1顾雪芹.中国生产性服务业开放与制造业价值链升级[J].世界经济研究,2020,0(3):121-134. 被引量:37
  • 2谢建国.经济影响、政治分歧与制度摩擦——美国对华贸易反倾销实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(12):8-17. 被引量:110
  • 3European Union. A Modular Approach to the Architecture of a Plurilateral Agreement on Services.
  • 4European Parliament's Committee on International Trade. The Plurilateral Agreement on Services, http. // www. europarl, europa, eu/document/activities/cont/201310/ 20131025ATT73459/20131025ATT73459EN. pdf, p. 9.
  • 5USITC, Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Econo- mies, Part 1, July 2013 and Part 2, August 2014.
  • 6European Parliament's Committee on International Trade. The Plurilateral Agreement on Services, available at http.. // www. europarl, europa, eu/document/activities/cont/201310/ 20131025ATT73459/20131025ATT73459EN. pdf, p. 8.
  • 7Iaeob Koch-Weser , Should China Join the WTO' s Services Agreement? USCC Economic Issue Brief No. 1, March 11, 2014, p. 2.
  • 8The Australian Services Roundtable (ASR) Submission, a- vailable at http. //www. dfat. gov. au/trade/negotiations/services/ downloads/australian- services- roundtable, pdf.
  • 9Council of Trade Union Submission, available at http. // www. dfat. gov. au/trade/negotiations/serviees/trade-in-services-a- greement, btml.
  • 10Nakatomi Michitaka, Services Negotiation and Plurilateral A- greements. TISA and sectoral approach, RIETI Policy Discussion Pa- per Series 14-P-023, September 2014, p. 12-15.

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部