期刊文献+

大直径陶瓷-陶瓷股骨头在保留股骨假体全髋关节翻修术中的应用 被引量:2

Use of large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in isolated revision of acetabular component
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价大直径陶瓷-陶瓷股骨头在保留股骨假体全髋关节翻修术中应用的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2006-01—2012-12在保留股骨假体全髋关节翻修术中应用直径36 mm陶瓷-陶瓷股骨头假体的32例(32髋)的临床资料。手术前后评估髋关节功能Harris评分,术后6周、6个月、1年及随后每隔半年随访中临床及X线片评价是否出现假体脱位、松动、下沉、骨溶解、陶瓷碎裂。结果 32例均获得随访平均26.2(11.0-38.0)个月。末次随访时髋关节功能Harris评分从术前平均68.9(9.0-87.0)分提高到85.0(39.0-98.0)分,差异有统计学意义(t=17.36,P=0.013)。均未出现假体脱位、松动、下沉、骨溶解、陶瓷破碎。结论大直径陶瓷-陶瓷股骨头在保留股骨假体的全髋关节翻修术中可以显著降低术后假体脱位率,不增加股骨侧假体周围骨溶解,可以获得较好的近、中期疗效。 Objective To evaluate the effect of large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in isolated revision of the acetabular component. Methods From January 2006 to December 2012, a total of 32 revision hip replacements were performed, in which acetabular component was revised to a new acetabular component with a ceramic liner and a large diameter head(36 mm), while retaining the well-fixed femoral component. Harris score was examined before and after operation.Clinical and radiological assessment was undertaken at six weeks, six months, one year and then bi-annually thereafter. The latest follow-up radiographs were compared with the post-operative films for evidence of dislocation,subsidence, loosening,osteolysis and fracture. Results All patients received follow-up for 11.0-38.0 months, with an average of 26.2 months. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly from 68.9(9.0 to 87.0) pre-operatively to 85.0(39.0 to 98.0) at the last follow up(t =17.36, P =0.013). There were no evidences of dislocation,subsidence, loosening, osteolysis and fracture. Conclusion The use of large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings can significantly decrease the instability in isolated revision of the acetabular component. The lysis won't progress in patients. Good short-term effects can be achieved.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2014年第10期978-979,共2页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 全髋关节翻修术 髋臼翻修 大直径陶瓷-陶瓷股骨头 Revision total hip arthroplasty Revision of acetabular component Large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1翁绳健,李炜明,詹洋,吴星,吴立忠,陈国龄.人工髋关节翻修术的临床分析(附32例报告)[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(12):1163-1164. 被引量:21
  • 2Park DK,Delia Valle CJ,Quigley L,et al. Revision of the acetabular component without cement: a concise follow-up,at twenty to twenty- four years ,of a previous report [J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,2009,91 (2) : 350-355.
  • 3D'Antonio JA,Capello WN,Naughton M. Ceramic bearings for total hip arthreplasty have high survivorship at 10 years [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012,470(2) : 373-381.
  • 4Sugano N,Takao Id,Sakai T,et al. Eleven- to 14-year follow-up results of cementless total hip arthroplasty using a third-generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing[J]. J Arthroplasty,2012,27(5): 736-741.
  • 5Streit MR,Schreder K,Korber M,et al. High survival in young patients using a second generation uncemented total hip replacement [J]. Int Orthop, 2012,36(6) : 1129-1136.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Kurtz SM,Ong KL,Schmier J. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,2007,(02):144-151.
  • 2Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures:treatment by mold arthroplasty[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1969.737-755.
  • 3Clohisy JC,Calvert G,Tull F. Reasons for revision hip surgery:a retrospective review[J].{H}Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,2004.188-192.
  • 4Minoda Y,Kobayashi A,Sakawa A. Wear particle analysis of highly crosslinked polyethylene isolated from a failed total hip arthroplasty[J].J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater,2008,(02):501-505.
  • 5Min BW,Song KS,Bae KC. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].{H}Journal of Arthroplasty,2008,(06):902-910.
  • 6Toms AD,Davidson D,Masri BA. The management of periprosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty[J].{H}JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME,2006,(02):149-155.
  • 7Ingham E,Fisher J. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement[J].{H}Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H:Journal of Enigineering in Medicine,2000,(01):21-37.
  • 8王春萍,翟明玉,魏暄,邹士平.一期翻修治疗全髋关节置换术后深部感染[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2010,25(8):706-707. 被引量:6
  • 9李炜明,翁绳健,吴立忠,吴星,詹洋,陈国龄.颗粒骨打压植骨结合非骨水泥臼固定在髋臼翻修中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(10):905-906. 被引量:9

共引文献20

同被引文献12

  • 1Kurtz S,Ong K,Lau E,et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthmplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2007,89(4) : 780-785.
  • 2Whaley AL,Berry DJ,Harmsen WS. Extra-large uncemented hemi- spherical aeetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,2001,83-A(9) : 1352-1357.
  • 3Moskal JT, Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI. Isolated revision acetabuloplastyusing a porous-coated cementless acetabular component without re- moval of a well-fixed femoral component. A 3-to 9-year follow-up study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1997,12(7) : 719-727.
  • 4Paprosky WG,Perona PG,Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classifi- cation and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1994,9(1):33-44.
  • 5Gustke KA. Jumbo cup or high hip center:is bigger better? [J]. J Arthroplasty,2004,19(4 Suppl 1): 120-123.
  • 6Gustke KA ,Levering MF, Miranda MA. Use of jumbo cups for revi- sion of acetabulae with large bony defects [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014,29(1) : 199-203.
  • 7Lachiewicz PF,Soileau ES. Fixation,survival,and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty [J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013,95(6) : 543-548.
  • 8Dearborn Jr, Harris WH. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using se- called jumbo cementless components:an average 7-year follow-upstudy[J]. J Arthroplasty,2000,15(1):8-15.
  • 9Fan CY,Chen WM,Lee OK,et al. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups:an experience in Asia [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008,128(8) : 809-813.
  • 10Garbuz DS,Masri BA,Duncan CP,et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award:Dislocation in revision THA :do large heads(36 and 40 ram) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,470(2):351-356.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部