摘要
《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国保险法>若干问题的解释(二)》中对保险人代位求偿权诉讼时效的规定引发了有关海上保险合同诉讼时效制度变革的争论,其中诉讼时效的起算是当前争论的焦点。《海商法》的规定具有其合理性,"司法解释(二)"的规定不应适用于海上保险。海上责任保险合同的诉讼时效起算于第三人请求被保险人承担法律责任之日。
The regulation of time limitation of action for fight of subrogation in the Interpretation Ⅱ of the Supreme People＇ s Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Insurance Law of the People＇ s Republic of China leads to the rise of voice regarding the reform of the time limitation of actionsystem for marine insurance contract. Among all the disputes, the starting point oflime limitation of action attracts most controversy. This paper analyzes the source and legislative value orientations of marine insurance contracts＇ time limitation of action. The author is of the opinion that the regulation of CMC is reasonable, while the regulation mentioned above in the Interpretation 11 of the Supreme People＇ s Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Insurance Law of the People＇ s Republic of China should not apply to marine insurance. Meanwhile, amendment shall be made to clarify that the starting point of time limitation of action for marine liability insurance contract is the date when the assured is claimed against liability by the third party.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第11期90-97,共8页
Law Science Magazine
基金
中国法学会部级法学研究课题"中国航运保险业发展的法律保障研究"[CLS(2012)B17]的阶段性成果
中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助(项目编号:3132014313)
关键词
海上保险合同
诉讼时效
起算点
marine insurance contract
time limitation of action
starting point
