期刊文献+

人工语法学习中意识加工的渐进发展 被引量:4

The Development of Graded Consciousness in Artificial Grammar Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内隐学习研究致力于探讨学习活动的意识加工程度,当前相关的研究逻辑从传统的意识二分观转向渐进意识假设。本研究通过对人工语法范式进行改造,并借鉴加工分离程序的有关思想,在学习阶段引入双重测量任务,并根据双重任务成绩计算分离出相应学习时段的意识与无意识成分的贡献分数,从而考察在内隐学习过程中两种加工成分的动态变化特征。研究结果支持渐进意识假设,在学习进程中,无意识成分和意识成分都呈现出渐进发展的趋势;而随学习的深入,两种成分呈现出不同的变化模式,中后期意识加工快速增长,无意识加工则保持平缓发展,渐进意识系统整体呈现向外显学习推进的发展态势。 Consciousness has always been much concerned in cognition science and, with the discovery of implicit learning in artificial grammar learning(AGL) researches, influences of unconscious processes on human cognition have been unprecedentedly highlighted. Dozens of empirical investigations have distinguished two different types of learning, i.e. explicit learning and implicit learning which involve conscious and unconscious processing respectively. Hence their critical attributes and interactive patterns have undergone tentative explorations and several theoretical frameworks have been proposed to demonstrate the underlying mental mechanisms, most of which take the side of dualistic logic. Empirical data tend to indicate that, rather than stand in dichotomy, so often they co-exist only with a quantitative difference. The academic dilemma is now broken through by the graded consciousness hypothesis, as a result of which new perspective arises from the graded consciousness dimension to deeply investigate implicit learning. In the present research the dynamic mental evolution pattern has been explored in artificial grammar learning, concerning both consciousness and knowledge representation. The current research adopts hypothesis of distributive representation and representation rehearsal which indicates that the ever-optimizing distributive representation dominates the learning process. Thus graded consciousness comes into form due to the increasing contribution of conscious processing. A dual-task design was introduced in current study with reference to the PDP paradigm formerly adopted in implicit memory researches. The innovative paradigm adopted a ‘slow' learning task and a ‘quick' task and the contribution patterns of consciousness and unconsciousness are different in the two tasks, as a result of which the contributions of conscious and unconscious processes could be extracted dynamically along the learning course. This innovative paradigm also makes possible a direct investigation of graded consciousness during the learning phase. The results of current study show that, in the implicit phase of artificial grammar learning, the contribution of conscious processing exhibited a slow-first-fast-later growing pattern while a slow-first-stable-later pattern was found with unconscious processing. In the beginning unconscious contribution prevailed but was eventually exceeded by conscious process in the subsequent blocks. However, in the first half of learning phase, consciousness contribution suffered an undulating performance while unconsciousness more stable. While entering the second half of learning phase, unconsciousness contribution exhibited a stagnating pattern and the uneven mode faded with consciousness process. These findings, compatible with those empirical researches assuming dichotomy logic, not only define distinguishable features for implicit learning and explicit learning, but also demonstrate the graded consciousness in artificial grammar learning and make possible a learning continuum progressing throughout the learning phase of artificial grammar. In the current study which assumed graded consciousness perspective the structures of knowledge representations have also been discussed indirectly. Conclusions are that the developing of unconscious representations precedes that of conscious representations, considering the undulation in the first half phase for consciousness and the stagnation in the second half phase for unconsciousness, which indicates a possible synergic effect between conscious and unconscious processing.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期1649-1660,共12页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31271084)
关键词 人工语法学习 渐进意识 内隐学习 artificial grammar learning graded consciousness implicit learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899-912.
  • 2Berry, D. C., & Dienes, Z. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
  • 3Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200-219.
  • 4Cleeremans, A., & Jimenez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R.M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, computational and philosophical consensus in the making? (pp. 1-40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • 5Clifford, C. W. G., Arabzadeh, E., & Harris, J. A. (2008). Getting technical about awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 54-58.
  • 6Dienes, Z., & Seth, A. (2010). Gambling on the unconscious: A comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19,674-681.
  • 7Frensch, P. A. (1998). One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • 8Frensch, P. A., & Riinger, D. (2003). Implicit learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 13-18.
  • 9Haider, H., Eichler, A., & Lange, T. (2011). An old problem: How can we distinguish between conscious and unconscious knowledge acquired in an implicit learning task? Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 658-672.
  • 10Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation frameworkseparating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.

同被引文献44

  • 1郭秀艳,邹玉梅,李强,孙怡.中学生颜色内隐学习特征的实验研究[J].心理与行为研究,2003,1(2):116-121. 被引量:10
  • 2郭秀艳,杨治良.内隐学习的研究历程[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(3):85-90. 被引量:27
  • 3付秋芳,傅小兰.内隐学习中表征与意识的关系[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(1):18-22. 被引量:11
  • 4Cleeremans, A., & Jim6nez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the maMng? (pp. 1-40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • 5Cohen J. R., & Poldrack R. A. (2008). Automaticity in motor sequence learning does not impair response inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 108-115.
  • 6Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociationprocedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343-350.
  • 7Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995) Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
  • 8Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338-351.
  • 9Fu, Q. F., Dienes, Z., & Fu, X. L. (2010). Can unconscious knowledge allow control in sequence learning?. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 462-474.
  • 10Higham, P. A., & Vokey, J. R. (2000). The controlled application of a strategy can still produce automatic effects: Reply to Redington (2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 476-480.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部