期刊文献+

GRADE在诊断准确性试验系统评价中应用的原理、方法、挑战及发展趋势 被引量:28

Rationales, Methods, Challenges and Development Tendency of Using GRADE in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Tests
原文传递
导出
摘要 诊断性试验的系统评价按基于原始研究的类型可分为两类:一类是基于诊断性随机对照试验的系统评价,其GRADE分级与干预性系统评价的方法类似;另外一类是基于诊断准确性试验的系统评价,其GRADE分级原理和方法是本文论述的重点。本文主要从理论分析的角度阐述了GRADE在诊断准确性试验系统评价中应用的原理、方法以及挑战。 Depending on different designs of original studies, systematic reviews of diagnostic studies could be cat- egorized into two kinds: one is based on diagnostic randomized controlled trials, of which the GRADE rating approach is similar to that of interventional systematic reviews; and the other is based on diagnostic accuracy tests, of which the GRADE rating approach is introduced in this article. This article explains the application of GRADE in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy tests mainly from the angle of theoretical analysis, including rationales, methods, and challenges.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2014年第11期1402-1406,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室开放基金
关键词 GRADE 证据分级 系统评价 诊断性试验 GRADE Grading evidence Systematic review Diagnostic test
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res, 2004, 4(1): 38.
  • 2Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924.
  • 3Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 4Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Version 0.9. 0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.
  • 5陈耀龙,杨克虎,姚亮,田金徽,拜争刚,马彬,李秀霞.GRADE系统方法学进展[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2013,8(1):64-65. 被引量:33
  • 6Schünemann AHJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.
  • 7Gopalakrishna G, Mustafa RA, Davenport C, et al. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 67(7): 760-768.
  • 8Siontis KC, Siontis G, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, et al. Diagnostic tests often fail to lead to changes in patient outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 67(6): 612-621.
  • 9Hsu J, Bro?ek J L, Terracciano L, et al. Application of GRADE: Making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines. Implementation Science, 2011, 6(1): 62.
  • 10GRADE工作组网站. [2014-6-6]. Available at: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/.

二级参考文献141

共引文献596

同被引文献306

引证文献28

二级引证文献2167

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部