摘要
目的:比较马来酸依那普利叶酸片单用及与5种钙离子拮抗剂联用治疗H型高血压的成本-效果。方法:选择2012年1月至2013年12月我院收治住院的H型高血压患者144例,根据治疗方案的不同分为6个治疗组:马来酸依那普利叶酸片单用组20例(A组)、马来酸依那普利叶酸片+甲磺酸氨氯地平片27例(B组)、马来酸依那普利叶酸片+苯磺酸氨氯地平片28例(C组)、马来酸依那普利叶酸片+马来酸左旋氨氯地平片22例(D组)、马来酸依那普利叶酸片+非洛地平缓释片23例(E组)、马来酸依那普利叶酸片+硝苯地平控释片24例(F组),运用药物经济学中的成本-效果分析方法,对各组治疗H型高血压药物进行评价,并做相应的敏感性分析。结果:A、B、C、D、E、F组有效率分别为60.0%、88.9%、89.3%、86.4%、87.0%、87.5%;与A组相比,B、C、D、E、F组的增量成本-效果比分别为2.01、4.55、3.00、3.07、3.88。结论:马来酸依那普利叶酸片与甲磺酸氨氯地平片联用治疗H型高血压是较安全、有效、经济的方案。
Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of enalapril maleate folic acid tablets used alone or combined with 5 kinds of calcium antagonists in treating H-hypertension.Methods: 144 cases of H-hypertension patients in our hospital were includ-ed during January 2012 to December 2013.According to the therapy measures, 144 cases were divided into six groups: enalapril maleate folic acid tablets 20 cases (group A), enalapril maleate folic acid tablets +amlodipine mesylate tablets 27 cases ( group B), enalapril maleate folic acid tablets +amlodipine bsylate tablets 28 cases ( group C), enalapril maleate folic acid tablets +levoamlodipine maleate tablets 22 cases (group D), enalapril maleate folic acid tablets +felodipine sustained release tablets 23 ca-ses (group E), enalapril maleate folic acid tablets +nifedipine controlled release tablets 24 cases ( group F).Cost-effectiveness a-nalysis was used and sensitivity analysis was performed at the same time.Results: A,B,C,D,E,F group total effective rate were 60.0%,88.9%,89.3%,86.4%,87.0%,87.5% respectively, compared to group A, the incremental cost of B, C, D, E, F group were 2.01,4.55,3.00,3.07,3.88.Conclusion: Cost-effectiveness analysis results were consistent with the clinical cura-tive effect evaluation conclusion, enalapril maleate folic acid tablets combined with amlodipine mesylate tablets was a more safe, ef-fective and reasonable cost to treat H-hypertension.
出处
《中国药物评价》
2014年第5期317-320,共4页
Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation