期刊文献+

国际投资中环境保护法律问题研究——以《北美自由贸易协定》为例

Legal Issue of Environmental Protection in International Investment Agreements——Taking North American Free Trade Agreement as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以《北美自由贸易协定》(NAFTA)中投资专章的环保规则为研究对象,并结合两个典型的案例,运用案例分析的方法,探究目前世界上处理国际投资与环境保护的冲突的做法。经研究表明,虽然NAFTA采取了在投资专章纳入环保规则的一种新的立法模式,试图去协调投资利益和环保利益,但实践中NAFTA未能较好地处理投资与环保的冲突,仲裁员屡屡牺牲了东道国的环保目标。最后仔细分析了出现此种研究结果的原因,根据研究结果对我国提出了相关建议,以便我国在签订对外投资协定时能吸取NAFTA的经验教训,较好地处理投资与国内环保的冲突。 Based on the environmental rules in Chapter 11 of North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA) and combined with two typical cases , the way to settle down the conflict between international investment and environmental protection worldwide in recent times is explored.The results show that the signing of NAFTA is deemed as a landmark in environmental protection , which tries to balance the conflict between international investment and environmental protection , however in practice , NAFTA fails to coordinate this conflict effectively , and the aim of environmental protection of a host country also fails to achieve.Finally, the reason why this happened is analyzed.? According to the results , advice to our government when it signs the foreign investment agreement with other countries in the future is given , so that China can learn some experience from NAFTA when dealing with the conflict between the investment and domestic environmental protection.
作者 王效文
出处 《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第5期33-39,共7页 Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 国际投资 环境保护 北美自由贸易协定 冲突 international investment environmental protection North American Free Trade Agreements conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States - Chile Free Trade Agreement [J]. Am. U. Int'l L. Rev,Vol. 19,2004, p. 708 - 740.
  • 2Doak Bishop, The Case for an Appellate Panel and its Scope of Review [ J ]. Transnatl Disp. Mgmt, Vol. 2,2005, p.10.
  • 3Susan Frank, The Legitimacy Crisis in International Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions [ J]. Fordham L. Rev, Vol. 73, 2005, p. 1607.
  • 4Erin E. Gleason, International Arbitral Appeals : What Are We So Afraid Of? [ J]. Pepp. Disp. Resol. L. J, Vol. 7,2007, footnote 98.
  • 5Erin E. Gleason, International Arbitral Appeals : What Are We So Afraid Of? [J]. Pepp. Disp. Resol. L. J, Vol. 7,2007,p. 284.
  • 6William H. Knult Ⅲ and Noah D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option [ J]. Am. Rev. Int'l Arb, Vol. 11,2000, p. 542.
  • 7William H. Knull III and Noah D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option [ J ]. Am. Rev. Intl Arb, Vol. 11,2000, p. 547.
  • 8David A. Gantz, An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitration Decisions in Investor - State Disputes: Prospects and Challenges [ J]. Vand. J. Transnat'l L, Vol. 39,2006, p. 51-52.
  • 9David A. Gantz, An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitration Decisions in Investor - State Disputes: Prospects and Challenges [ J]. Vand. J. Transnat'l L, Vol. 39,2006, p. 52-53.
  • 10Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act, 19 U. S.C. 3g02(b) (3) (G) (Ⅳ) (2002).

共引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部