期刊文献+

肾脏旋转在后腹腔镜肾脏部分切除术中的应用 被引量:7

The application of the renal rotation technique in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨肾脏旋转在后腹腔镜肾脏部分切除术中应用的有效性和可行性.方法 我院行后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中采用肾脏旋转方法切除肾脏腹侧、肾门部以及肾脏下极肿瘤38例,肿瘤位于肾脏腹侧29例(其中肾门部22例),肾脏下极9例.肿瘤直径1.5 -4.6 cm,平均2.8cm.术前按美国肿瘤联合委员会(AJCC)肾癌TNM肿瘤分期均为T1No Mo.结果 38例后腹腔镜肾部份切除术均顺利完成,无中转开放,术中未出现大血管或临近脏器损伤等严重并发症.术后发生并发症3例,包括血尿1例,皮下气肿2例,其中血尿患者经保守处理后痊愈.术后随访1 - 26个月,平均17个月,未发现肿瘤复发或远处转移.结论 肾脏旋转用于后腹腔镜肾脏部分切除术是安全可行的,对于后腹腔暴露不佳的肾内侧(包括肾门处肿瘤)以及部分肾下极肿瘤具有术野暴露充分、方便手术操作等优点. Objective Introduction Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is one of the standard methods for treating T1 stage renal carcinoma which suffers from narrow operation space and difficultly in operation.Our aim is to investigate the safety and feasibility of renal rotation technique in RPN.Methods Between April 2012 and June 2014,the renal rotation technique in RPN was performed in 22 male and 16 female patients with stage T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma aged 31-75 years (mean 52).In 29 cases tumor located in ventral side of kidney,including 22 cases in the renal hilum and 9 cases in inferior pole of kidney.Tumor size was 1.5-4.6 cm,mean 2.8 cm.Results All the 38 cases of operations were successfully accomplished without conversion to open surgery.There were no intraoperative complications and 3 cases postoperative complications.Operation time was 45-116 min,mean 59 min; blood loss was 20-120 ml,mean 40 ml,with no patients needed blood transfusion.The average kidney ischemia time was 21 min (15-38 min).No patients had local recurrence or metastasis after 1-26 months' follow-up.Conclusion Application of the renal rotation technique in RPN for tumors located at ventral side,at renal hilum,or at the inferior pole of kidney,is safe and feasible,and worth wider clinical application.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期2603-2604,共2页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
关键词 肾脏旋转 后腹腔镜 肾部分切除术 Renal rotation Retroperitoneoscopy Partial nephrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1邬善敏,方伟,赫杰,谭海燕.可吸收生物缝合线在普外科中的应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1570-1571. 被引量:10
  • 2Allaf ME, Bhayani S, Rogers BC. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrecto- my : evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. J Urol, 2004, 172 : 871-873.
  • 3Celic-Spuzic E. Effect of anesthesia on the changes in the hormones levels during and after transvesical prostatectomy [ J ]. Med Arh,2011, 65 (6) :348-353.
  • 4(;ill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoseopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients[J]. J Urol,2003,170(1):64- 68.
  • 5Allaf ME, Bhayani S, Rogers BC, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long term oncological outcome [J]. J Urol,2004,172(3) :871-873.
  • 6Seifman BD, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS. Laparoscopic neph- ron sparing surgery for a renal mass: 1-year minimum fol- low up[J]. J Endourol,2004,18(8) :783-786.
  • 7Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Zorn KC, et al. Comparison of lap- aroscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical Tla renal tumors[J]. J Endourol,2008,22(5) : 953-957.
  • 8Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases[J]. J Urol, 2005,173(1) :42-47.
  • 9Lane BR, Novick AC, Babineau D, et al. Comparison of lap aroscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solita- ry kidney[J]. J Urol,2008,179(3):847-852.
  • 10Kane C J, Mallin K, Ritchey J, et al. Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the national cancer data base[J]. Cancer,2008,113(1) :78-83.

共引文献62

同被引文献64

  • 1冯建伟,祖强,孙圣坤,卢锦山,史立新,蔡伟,孙博,张旭,董隽.单孔后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与标准后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的对比研究[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(2):73-76. 被引量:6
  • 2LJUNGBERG B, BENSALAH K, CANFIELD S, et al. EAU Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma, 2014 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2015,67(5) : 913-924.
  • 3GILL I S, KAVOUSSI L R, LANE B R, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single re- nal tumors[J]. J Uro1,2007,178(1) 41-46.
  • 4MINERVINI A, SIENA G, ANTONELLI A, et al. Open ver- sus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical tla renal mas- ses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with trifecta out- comes (record project)[J]. World J Urol,2014,32(1) :257-263.
  • 5MARSZALEK M, MEIXL H, POLAJNAR M, et aL Laparo- scopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients[J]. Eur Uro1,2009,55(5):1171-1178.
  • 6LERNER CAHM SE. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery[J]. J Urol, 1996,155 : 1868-1873.
  • 7MITCHELL RE, GILBERT SM, MURPHY AM, et al. Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy offer similar cancer out- comes in renal cortical tumors 4 em or larger[J]. Urology,2006, 67(2) :260-264.
  • 8PATARD J, SHVARTS O, LAM JS, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all tl tumors based on an international multicenter experience[J]. J Urol,2004,171(6) :2181-2185.
  • 9JANG HA KJ BS. Oncologic and functional outcomes after par- tial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in tlb renal cell car- cinoma: a multicenter, matched case-control study in korean pa- tients[J]. Cancer Res Treat,2015(Jun 5).
  • 10KIM J M, SONG P H, KIM H T, et al. Comparison of partial and radical nephrectomy for ptlb renal cell carcinoma[J]. Kore- an J Urol,2010,51(9) :596.

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部