期刊文献+

二语习得研究与语言类型学 被引量:6

Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Typology
原文传递
导出
摘要 语言类型学和二语习得研究之间的交流和互动包括两个方面:一方面,语言类型学中概括出的语言共性及其变异形式,可以为二语习得研究提供理论依据,为描述、解释和预测二语习得中的各种现象提供新的视角和参项,提升二语习得及中介语研究的理论高度。另一方面,学习者的语言可作为语言类型学研究的样本,二语习得的过程可为语言类型学提供一个潜在的窗口,二语习得可以作为语言共性研究和语言类型变异趋向的试金石,对习得过程的考察可使我们对语言的本质和人类的认知获得更多了解。本文对这两方面的研究进行评述和展望。 The dialogue and interaction between linguistic typology (LT) and second language acquisition (SLA) studies are by definition mutual. On the one hand, the universals and variation patterns derived in typological studies may serve as the starting theoretical hypotheses, research parameters and perspectives in describing, explaining, and predicting various phenomena encountered in SLA, so that SLA may be brought to new horizons and theoretical heights. On the other hand, interlanguages can be taken as testing grounds for LT; its developmental process reveals a lot about the nature of human language and human cognition. This article reviews and proposes further studies in both directions.
作者 王勇 周迎芳
机构地区 华中师范大学
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期49-55,共7页 Foreign Languages in China
关键词 二语习得 中介语 语言类型学 语言共性 second language acquisition interlanguages language typology language universal
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Aronoff, M. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes [M]. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1994.
  • 2Bowerman, M. Typological perspectives on language acquisition: Do crosslinguistic patterns predict development? [A]. In Eve V. Clark (ed). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum [C]. Stanford, Cal.: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1993: 7-15.
  • 3Broselow, E. Non-obvious transfer: On predicting epenthesis errors [A]. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (eds). Language Transfer in Language Learning [C]. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1983: 269-280.
  • 4Comrie, 13. Why linguistics needs language acquisition? [A]. In W. E. Rutherford(ed). Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition [C]. 1984: 11-29.
  • 5Croft, W. Typology and Universals [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 6Eckman, F. R. Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis [J]. Language Learning, 1977(27): 315-330.
  • 7Eckman, F. R. The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant cluster in the interlanguage of ESL learners [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1991(13): 23-41.
  • 8Eckman, F. R. Linguistic typology and second language acquisition [A]. In J. J. Song (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 : 618- 633.
  • 9Ellis, R. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • 10Gass, S. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations [J]. Language Learning, 1979(29): 327-345.

二级参考文献75

共引文献75

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部