理解危机与变革的三种视角及其超越被引量：1

Three Perspectives to Understand Crisis and Change and Beyond

下载PDF

导出

摘要危机与变革是整个社会科学的核心研究议题之一,西方学界主要从制度主义、结构主义和过程主义三种视角来进行分析。在解释制度变革方面,理性选择学派和权力学派占据主要位置。结构主义视角对解释宏观发展效果很好。过程主义分析结合了宏观和微观的分析因素。这三者视角尽管产生了丰硕的成果,但是也具有很强的局限性。战略行为场域理论试图把制度、结构和过程结合起来,从而提供更加全面的分析。这些研究视角对我国的社会科学研究很有帮助,需要我们努力学习和批评借鉴。同时,我们也要有理论自信,相信我们也能发展出更好的研究视角,来分析中国和解释中国。 Crisis and change are the main study field in the whole social sciences. Western scholars study them from perspectives of institution, structure and process. In terms of explaining institutional change, rational choice and power schools are the main camps. Structural perspective can do a better job in accounting for macro development. The process perspective combines the macro and micro analyses. Even though these three perspectives have yielded substantial fruits, they have their own limitations. Strategic action fields theory attempts to combine them together in order to provide more comprehensive analysis. These approaches are all very helpful for China's social science research, and we need to critically learn and use them. Meanwhile, we should have theory confidence and believe that we can develop better perspectives to analyze and explain China.

作者张春满

机构地区美国约翰霍普金斯大学政治学

出处《社会主义研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期98-104,共7页 Socialism Studies

关键词危机变革制度结构过程 Crisis Change Institution Structure Process

分类号 C913.7 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献27

1Mark Blyth,“Great punctuations”,American Political Science Review ,Vol.100,No.4,2006,pp.493-498.
2Stephen JayGould and Niles Eldredge,"Punctuated Equilibria:The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered", Paleobiology ,Vol.3,No.2,1977,pp.115-151.
3Sartori, Giovanni,"Concept Misformation in C omparative Politics",American Political Science Review6 4,1970,pp.1033-1053.
4Peter H all a nd Rosemary Taylor,"Political Science a nd the T hree New Institutionalisms"PoliticalS tudies,Vol.44,1996, p.938.
5Peter H all a nd Rosemary Taylor,"Political Science a nd the T hree New Institutionalisms"PoliticalS tudies,Vol.44,1996,p.947,26-27,15-16,23,31,278,278-279,153,2,3,4,7,9,10.
6Kenneth Shepsle,"Rational C hoice Institutionalism,"Oxford H andbook of Political Institutions.Oxford:O xford University P ress,2006,p.24,25.
7Douglass N orth,Institutions, Institutional C hange a nd E conomic Performance, Cambridge:CambridgeU niversity P ress 1990.p.3.
8James M ahoney a nd K athleen T helen,ed.,Explaining Institutional C hange:Ambiguity,Agency a nd Power .NewY ork:Cambridge University P ress,2010,p.2,14,4.
910Mark Blyth,"Great p unctuations,"American Political Science Review ,Vol.100,No.4,2006,p.497.
10Levi,Margaret,"Reconsiderations of R ational C hoice in C omparative a nd Historical A nalysis."InC o m p a r ative Politic s: R atio n a lit y, C u lt u r e , a n d St r u ct u r e ,e d .,M a r k I r v i n g Lic h b a c h a n d A la nS.Zuckerman,2nd e d.,New York:Cambridge University P ress,2008,pp.117-133.

二级参考文献55

1Kathleen Thelen, How htstitutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
2Kevin Ford, Neal Schmitt, Susan Schechtman, Brian Huhs, and Mary Doherty, "Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions," Organizational Behavior and tluman Decision Processes, Vol.43, No.1, 1989, pp. 75-117.
3Alexander George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science, p. 226.
4Alexander George and Timothy McKeown, "Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making," in Robert Coulam and Richard Smith, eds., Advances in htformation Processing in Organizations, Vol. 2, Greenwich: JAI Press, 1985, p. 35.
5Alexander George, "The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making Behavior: The 'Operational Code' Belief System, " in Lawrence Falkowski, ed. , Psychological Models in International Politics, Boulder: Westview Press, 1979, pp.95-124.
6Alexander George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science, p. 206.
7John Gerring, Case Stud)" Research: Principles and Practices, p. 173.
8Zeev Maoz, "Case Study Methodology in International Studies: From Storytelling to Hypothesis Testing," pp. 464-466.
9David Hackett Fischer, Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought, pp. 167-169.
10Peter Hall, "Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics," 转引自Alexander George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science, p.206.