期刊文献+

国内外强互惠理论研究最新进展及其评述 被引量:2

Overview on Strong Reciprocity Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为一项跨域研究成果,强互惠理论的提出为人们解释和理解合作行为提供了一种新的视角,在短短十几年间便受到了广泛关注。目前国内外学术界关于强互惠的探讨主要集中在强互惠的界定、强互惠的成因及影响因素分析、强互惠的演化模型研究、强互惠理论的应用和发展等层面上。进一步的研究可以聚焦于以下几个问题:为强互惠理论提供更多的现实证据作为支撑、探明强互惠的激励机制以及在强互惠的理论背景下重新思考人性假设以指导管理实践。 Strong reciprocity is a willing to sacrifice resources for rewarding fair and punishing unfair behavior even this is costly and provides neither present nor future material rewards for the reciprocator. As an interdisciplinary research, strong reciprocity theory provides a new perspective for people to interpret and understand cooperative behavior. Researchers are focusing on questions such as the definition of strong reciprocity, causes of strong reciprocity and the influencing factors, evolution models of strong reciprocity, development and application of strong reciprocity theory. Providing more realistic evidences for strong reciprocity theory, finding out the motivation mechanism of strong reciprocity and rethinking about human nature hypothesis in the context of strong reciprocity should be given more attention.
作者 陈宏波 罗辉
出处 《科学与管理》 2014年第6期17-25,共9页 Science and Management
关键词 强互惠 利他性惩罚 内在激励 “情境人”假设 Strong Reciprocity Altruistic Punipshment Intrinsic Motivation Situation man
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献91

  • 1叶航,汪丁丁,罗卫东.作为内生偏好的利他行为及其经济学意义[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):84-94. 被引量:150
  • 2赵晓峰,袁松.泵站困境、农民合作与制度建构——一个博弈论的分析视角[J].甘肃社会科学,2007(2):8-10. 被引量:13
  • 3曼瑟尔·奥尔森.1965:集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海三联出版社,1995.
  • 4Garrett Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons[ J ]. Science, 1968 (162) : 1 243 - 1 248.
  • 5Elinor Ostrom. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms [ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspective, 2000,14 ( 3 ) : 137 -158.
  • 6Ernst Fehr, Simon Gachter. Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity [ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000,14(3) :159 - 181.
  • 7Gintis, Bowles. The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations [ J ]. Theoretical Population Biology,2004,65 : 17 - 28.
  • 8Apicella, P., Ljungberg, T., Scarnati, E., & Schultz, W. (1991). Responses to reward in monkey dorsal and ventral striatum. Experimental Brain Research, 85(3), 491-500.
  • 9Bendor, J., & Mookherjee, D. (1990). Norms, third-party sanctions, and cooperation. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 6, 33-63.
  • 10Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren't fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131-144.

共引文献22

同被引文献34

  • 1张洪恩,王覃刚.强互惠理论的扩展[J].中国工业经济,2007(3):70-78. 被引量:12
  • 2叶航,汪丁丁,罗卫东.作为内生偏好的利他行为及其经济学意义[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):84-94. 被引量:150
  • 3易余胤,肖条军,盛昭瀚.合作研发中机会主义行为的演化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(4):80-87. 被引量:106
  • 4王覃刚.关于强互惠及政府型强互惠理论的研究[J].经济问题,2007(1):10-12. 被引量:14
  • 5周清树.茂名官场窝案重启调查[N].新京报,2014-04-21(a18).
  • 6人民日报.中纪委今年通报2 1 名对抗组织调查干部[EB/OL]. http : //politics, people, com. n/2015/0813/1001-27453809. html,2015-08-13.
  • 7Ashforth B, Anand V. The normalization of corruptionin organizations [J]. Research in OrganizationalBehavior,2003 (25).
  • 8Pinto J 0 , Leana C A, Pil F R. Corrupt organizationsor organizations of corrupt individuals- Two types oforganization-level corruption [J]. Academy ofManagement Review,2008 ( 3).
  • 9Brief A P , Buttram R T and Dukerich J M. Collectivecorruption in the corporate world: Toward a processmodel [M]. Groups at Work: Theory and Research,Erlbaum,2001.
  • 10Mishra A. Persistence of Corruption: Some TheoreticalPerspectives [J]. World Development,2006 (2).

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部