期刊文献+

专名与通名互转的认知机制研究 被引量:6

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从认知语法的角度出发,对专有名词和普通名词做了解读并探讨了二者相互转化的机制。本文认为专有名词在语法地位上相当于一个压缩的限定短语,其所指不因语境而发生变化。普通名词与专有名词的相互转化说明它们实际上是一个事物的两个方面,各自承担着不同的功能。此外,不同的语言专名和通名的互转在表层形式有所不同,但深层机制是一样的。 This paper interprets the proper noun and the common noun and explores their mutual transference from the perspective of cognitive grammar. The paper believes that as far as grammatical status is concerned, a proper noun is equivalent to a compressed determiner phrase, whose referent remains stable in different contexts. The mutual transference between the proper noun and the common noun shows that they are actually the two sides of the same coin, only bearing different functions. In addition, the mutual transference may be different on the surface level cross-linguistically, but it is the same on the deep level.
作者 马军
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 CSSCI 2014年第4期29-32,共4页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基金 新疆大学博士毕业生科研启动基金项目"英汉专有名词对比研究"(项目编号:BS110220)的部分研究成果
关键词 专有名词 普通名词 认知语法 互转 proper noun common noun cognitive grammar mutual transference
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Anderson, J. M. The Grammar of Names[ M ]. Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press, 2007.
  • 2Bach, K. Thought and Reference [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1987.
  • 3Coates, R. A new theory of properhood[A]. In E. Brylla & M. Wahl- berg, ( eds. ). Proceedings of the XX1 International Congress of Ono- mast/c Sciences[C]. Uppsala: SOFI, 2005: 125-137.
  • 4Coates, R. A strictly Millian Approach to the definition of the proper name[J]. Mind & Language, 2009(4) : 433-444.
  • 5Frege, G. Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitsehrift fur philosophie und philosophisehe kritik [ A ]. (Trans. as) On sense mad reference [ A ]. In Peter Geach and Max Black (eds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege[ C ]. Oxford: Blaekwell, 1892 : 25-50.
  • 6Gardiner, A. H. The Theory of Proper Names: A Controversial Essay [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1954.
  • 7Jespersen, O. The Philosophy of Grammar[M]. Beijing: World Pub- lishing Corporation, 1924/2008.
  • 8Katz, J. J. A proper theory of names[J]. Philosophical Studies, 1977 (31) : 1-80.
  • 9Katz, J. J. The end of Millianism: Multiple bearers, improper names and compositional meaning[J]. Journal of Philosophy, 2001 (98) :137- 166.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I: Theoret- ical Prerequisites [ M ]. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1987.

二级参考文献18

  • 1高华,金苏扬.无格的同源宾语——最简方案内特征核查得出的结论[J].外语与外语教学,2000(6):62-64. 被引量:20
  • 2Burzio, L. Italian Syraaz: A Government-Binding Approach [ M ]. Dordrecht: Reidd, 1986.
  • 3Jones, M. Cognate objects and the case-filler[J]. Jorunal of Linguistics, 1968(24) :89-110.
  • 4Golclberg, A. Constructuions: A Constructiorud Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.
  • 5Goldberg, A. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 6Hoche, S. Cognate Object Constructions in English: A Cognitive-Linguistics Account[M]. Tubingen: Narr, 2009.
  • 7Kim, Jong-Bok & Jooyoung Lim. English cognate object construction: A usage-based, construction grammar approach[J]. English Language and Linguistics, 2012:18(3) :31-55.
  • 8Langacker, R. Concept, Image and Symbd: The Cognitine Basis of Grammar[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1990/2002.
  • 9Lamgaeker, R. Foundations of Gognitive Grammar. Vol II: Descriptive Application[M]. Stanford, Cad: Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 10Langacker, R. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Reader[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

共引文献5

同被引文献52

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部