期刊文献+

基于标记—偏误假说的学习者请求言语行为偏误分析 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从学习者实施请求时收集的语料入手,发现其中出现的偏误类型主要分为语法错误和语用失误两大类,占到所有语料的27.4%,其中语用失误占总偏误的78.9%。社会因素对学习者的偏误次数产生影响,等级体系中偏误次数最多,主要表现在招呼语的错误使用上。不同水平学习者在语法错误上没有差异,差异主要体现在语用失误上,随着学习者语言水平的提高,语用失误次数有所下降,但是该差异并不具备统计学意义。研究结果表明学习者语法能力的提高并不会自动带来语用能力的提高;针对语料中出现的母语负迁移现象,本文提出标记—偏误假说来解释语法错误发生的条件。 After analyzing the learners' data, we have found that the errors learners make when making requests fall into two categories : grammatical mistakes and pragmatic failures, making up 27.4% of the overall corpus. Out of the errors, pragmatic failures alone account for 78.9%. Social factors exert an influence on leaners' errors, which can be found mainly in Hierarchical System and mostly are address forms. Two groups of learners show no difference on grammatical mistakes; even though the CET-6 group make fewer errors than CET-4 group, which is not statistically significant. The findings indicate that the improvement of grammatical ability would not automatically lead to the bettering of pragmatic ability; the negative mother-language transfer can be explained by markedness-error hypothesis proposed in this article.
作者 刘陈艳
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 CSSCI 2014年第4期56-60,共5页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基金 山西省教育厅研究生教育改革项目"培养研究生英语交际能力 提升人才社会服务水平"(2013年6月到2014年6月)的阶段性成果
关键词 错误分析 语法错误 语用失误 社会因素 学习者水平 标记—偏误假说 error analysis grammatical mistakes pragmatic failures social factors learners 'profieiency markedness-error hypothesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bardovi-Harlig, K. Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage prag- matics : A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics [J]. Language Learning, 1999 (49) :677 -713.
  • 2Brown, P. & Levinson, S. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena[ A ]. In Goody, E. ( ed. ). Qtzestions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction[ C ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1978: 56-289.
  • 3Corder, S. P. The significance of learners' errors[J]. Intercultural Review of Applied Linguistics, 1967 ( 5 ) : 161-169.
  • 4Eckman, F. Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis[ J]. Language Learning, 1977 ( 27 ) : 315-330.
  • 5Eekman, F. The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant cluster in the interlanguage of ESL learners [ J ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1991 ( 13 ) : 23-41.
  • 6Ellis, R. Second Language Acquisition [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford Universi- ty Press, 1997.
  • 7Kahraman, B. & Akkus, D. The use of request expressions by Turk- ish learners of Japanese [ J ]. Journal of Theory and Practice in Educa- tion, 2007( 1 ) : 122-139.
  • 8Klein, W. Second Language Acquisition [ M ]. Edward Arnold : Cam- bridge University Press, 1986.
  • 9Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. Intercultural C, course Approach (2"a Edition)[M]. Malden, MA: Blaekwell, 2001.
  • 10Thomas, J. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure [ J ]. Applied Linguistics, 1983(4) : 91-112.

二级参考文献15

共引文献3

同被引文献11

  • 1莱文逊.语用学[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
  • 2Ellis,R.(2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 3Blum-Kulka,S.(1987).Indireetness and politeness in requests:Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11 (2), 131-146.
  • 4Hong,W.(1996).An empirical study of Chinese request strategies. International Joumal of the Sociology of Language, 122,(1), 127-138.
  • 5Rose,K.R.(2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2. Journal of Pragmatics,41 ,(11):2345-2364.
  • 6Li,S.(2014). The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System,45:103-116.
  • 7马莉.显性教学对高中生英语语用能力的影响[J].山东师范大学外国语学院学报(基础英语教育),2009,11(3):14-18. 被引量:5
  • 8王晓彤,张绍杰.“请求”言语行为的跨文化研究[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(3):117-120. 被引量:4
  • 9卢加伟.国外二语语用教学研究述评[J].现代外语,2013,36(2):206-211. 被引量:30
  • 10毛延生.汉语不礼貌话语的语用研究[J].语言教学与研究,2014(2):94-102. 被引量:20

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部