摘要
城邦的由来是亚里士多德《政治学》关心的一个重要问题,亚里士多德关于这个问题的论述集中体现了他的政治自然主义立场。亚里士多德认为城邦是由于自然而存在的,并给出了相应的论证。但是,这个主张却引起后世许多学者的争论和批评。当代研究亚里士多德政治哲学的两位重要学者大卫·凯耶特和弗雷德·米勒分别对这个主张作出阐释,但是他们的解释存在各种问题。根据派生的内在目的论解释,我们不仅可以恰当理解亚里士多德关于城邦的自然生成论的深刻含义,而且可以认识到城邦在亚里士多德的哲学中究竟具有怎样的本体论地位。
The origin of city- state is a leading problem concerned by Aristotle＇s politics. Aristotle＇s exposition on this problem focused on his political naturalist standing. Aristotle thought city- states originated from the existence of nature,and also provided corresponding argumentations. But this proposal posed controversy and criticisms from many later scholars. The two leading contemporary scholars studying Aristotle＇s political philosophy——David Keyt and Fred D. Miller,who have made interpretations on it,yet some problems existed. A derivative inherent teleology is advocated in this paper,based on which we can not only properly understand Aristotle＇s profound connotation on natural generative theory of city- state,but also recognize what kind of ontological position city- state plays in Aristotle＇s philosophy.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期19-25,共7页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
河南省哲学社会科学规划项目"亚里士多德自然主义政治哲学及其当代影响"(2014CZX010)
河南理工大学博士基金项目"亚里士多德政治自然主义哲学思想及其时代价值(SKB2015-9)
