期刊文献+

协商、文化差异与原住民自治 被引量:5

Deliberation,Cultural Difference,and Indigenous Self-Governance
原文传递
导出
摘要 多元社会中的文化差异导致少数民族群体在政治决策中处于明显的弱势地位,尤其在强调理解和考虑政治共同体所有成员的观点与利益的协商民主条件下;由此,政治决策的合法性将受到质疑并被严重削弱。本文通过原住民群体与主流社会的鲜明对比,展示了文化的不可通约性、理性互惠原则和民主政治决策达成等方面所凸显的困境,进而肯定了在多元文化社会中协商民主的治理价值。此外,本文还审慎地提出赋予原住民群体以自治权,将其视为一种避免造成少数民族群体的政治弱势和维护政治共同体的合法性的有效途径。 Cultural differences in Pluralistic societies lead to significantly political disadvantages of minority groups in political decisions, especially with emphasis on understanding and taking into account the perspectives and interests of all members of the political community under deliberative democracy, so its political legitimacy will be questioned and seriously undermined. This essay demonstrates outstanding dilemmas on the cultural incommensurability, the principle of rational reciprocity and reaching democratic political decisions with a distinctive comparison between indigenous groups and the majority society, and then affirms governance value of deliberative democracy in multicultural societies. Moreover, this essay judiciously put forward to granting indigenous groups powers of self-governance, which is regarded as a kind of the effective ways to avoid political disadvantages of minority groups and maintain legitimacy of a political community.
出处 《世界民族》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期69-74,共6页 Journal of World Peoples Studies
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"公共理性语境下的中国协商民主研究"(项目编号:12YJA810012)的支持
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Jorge M. Valadez, Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, and Self-Determination in Multicultural Societies, Westview Press, Colorado, 2001, pp. 77 -78.
  • 2Saskatchewan Indian Federated College: "Co-Managing Natural Resources with First Nations: Guidelines to Reaching Agreements and Making them Work", http ://www. ainc - inac. gc. ca/pr/ra/com/pfn_e. html.
  • 3James Bohman, Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, MIT Press, 1996, p. 91.

同被引文献85

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部