期刊文献+

废弃农畜产品回收环节农业保险主体决策分析 被引量:4

Decision Analysis of Agricultural Insurance Subjects in Recovery of Abandoned Agricultural and Livestock Products
原文传递
导出
摘要 对目前我国废弃农畜产品回收环节频现的随意丢弃、非法收购贩卖问题,在该环节实施农业保险以促进废弃农畜产品的回收利用是有效解决对策。为明确该环节实施农业保险相关主体——农户、保险公司与政府部门的决策及其影响因素,促进这一环节农业保险的顺利开展,考虑到消费者对农产品质量安全以及社会效益的重视程度,利用优化模型分析了该农业保险参与主体的农户努力水平、保险公司保费以及政府补贴决策及其影响因素。主要结论表明:当消费者对农产品质量安全重视程度过低时,增强该重视程度对农户来说不一定有利;当平均理赔率低于某一值时,消费者对社会效益的重视程度增强将使单位保费上涨。 For the problems of randomly discarding and illegal acquisition and selling of abandoned agricultural and livestock products, agricultural insurance is an effective solution which can promote recycling and utilization of aban- doned agricultural and livestock products. In order to darify factors influencing decisions of various agricuhural in- surance subjects including farmers, insurance companies, and relevant government departments, and facilitate its smooth development, the paper applied optimized models to analyze the effort level of farmers, insurance premiums of insurers and the government subsidy, taking into consideration consumer's attention to the quality and safety of agricultural products and the social benefit. The main conclusions showed that when the consumer' s attention to product quality and safety was low, it was not necessarily advantageous for the farmers to lift consumer attention, and when the average claim rate was below a certain amount, the unit premium would increase with the heightened con- sumer attention to the social benefit.
作者 费威
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期3-11,127,共10页 Insurance Studies
基金 国家社科基金项目(14CGL040) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(12JZD025) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC630029) 辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(W2013211)资助
关键词 农业保险 决策分析 废弃农畜产品 回收环节 agricultural insurance decision analysis abandoned agricultural and livestock product recovery link
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献179

共引文献515

同被引文献61

  • 1宁满秀.农业保险制度的环境经济效应——一个基于农户生产行为的分析框架[J].农业技术经济,2007(3):28-32. 被引量:13
  • 2罗杰·珀曼著 侯元兆译著.自然资源与环境经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2002..
  • 3Anderson,S. and Newell, R. G. :Simplified Marginal Effects in Discrete Choice Models, Economics Letters, 2003,81 (3) :321 -326.
  • 4Fukushima H, Gomyoda M. Hydrochloric acid treatment for rapid recovery of Shiga toxin - producing Esche- richia coli 026,0111 and 0157 from feces, food and environmental samples[ J]. Zentralb! Bakteriol, 1999 (289) : 285 - 299.
  • 5Horowitz, John, Erik Lichtenberg. Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Chemical Use in Agriculture [ J ]. AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics. 1993,75 (4) :926 -935.
  • 6Jungik Kim, Peter Goldsmith, Michael H. Thomas. Economic impact and public costs of confined animal feed- ing operations at the parcel level of Craven County [ J ]. Agriculture and Human Values, 2010,27 ( 1 ) :29 - 42.
  • 7Lung A J,Lin C M. Destruction of Escherichia coli 0157: H7 and Salmonella enteritidis in cow manure com- posting [ J ]. J. Food Prot,2001 (64) : 1309 - 1314.
  • 8Smith, Vincent and Barry Goodwin. Crop Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Agricultural Chemical Use [ J ]. Amer- ican Journal of Agricultural Economics[ J]. 1996,78(2) :428 -438.
  • 9Wu ,J. Crop Insurance, Acreage Decisions and Non -point Source Pollution [ J ]. American Journal of Agricul- tural Economics [ J ]. 1999,81 (2) :305 - 320.
  • 10Goodwin B K. Problems with market insurance in agriculture [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 83(3): 643-649.

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部