期刊文献+

某医院临床路径管理下患者满意度调查问卷的信效度分析 被引量:26

Reliability and validity analysis of a Beijing hospital patients' satisfaction questionnaire in clinical pathway management mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨临床路径管理下患者满意度调查问卷的信度与效度.方法 用原卫生部推荐的临床路径《患者满意度调查问卷》,调查医院临床路径患者的满意度,运用统计学方法进行信度、效度分析.结果 调整后的问卷总体Cronbach's α系数值是0.947,各维度的α系数值分别为0.563、0.968、0.820,折半信度系数是0.869.以调整之后的条目为变量进行因子分析,共提取3个公因子,公因子与问卷设计的结构假设相同,公因子的累积方差贡献率是74.178%,且每个条目在相应的因子上的因子载荷>0.4,各条目对某一公因子具有较高负荷.结论 虽然各医院的实际情况有差异,但是从统计学和临床角度考虑,可以使用本问卷对临床路径管理模式患者进行满意度调查. Objective To probe into the reliability and validity of the questionnaire on clinical pathways and patients' satisfaction.Methods Investigating the hospital patients' satisfaction with the questionnaire designed by the former Ministry of Health and analyzing the internal consistency and constructive validity through statistical methods.Results Cronbach' s α coefficient of the adjusted questionnaire was 0.947 and those of the each subscale were 0.563,0.968 and 0.820.The split-half reliability of the questionnaire was 0.869.The number of factors is 3 as same as the designed assuming structure,and the cumulative contribution rate of 3 factors was 74.178%.The factor loading of each item was above 0.4,each item of a common factor with a higher load factor.Conclusion Although there are differences from hospital to hospital,this questionnaire is applicable to investigating patients' satisfaction of the clinical pathway management mode in view of the statistical and clinical practice.
出处 《中华医院管理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第12期952-954,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
关键词 临床路径 患者满意度 信度 效度 Clinical pathways Patients' satisfaction Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1孙希凤,郝元涛,方积乾.老年人生存质量量表条目的初步筛选[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(7):455-457. 被引量:20
  • 2Power M,Quinn K,Schmidt S,the WHOQOL-OLD Group.Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module.Quality of Life Research,2005,14(2):197-2214.
  • 3Thompson DR,Jenkinson C,et al.Development and validation of a short measure of health status for individuals with acute myocardial infarction:The myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale(MIDAS).Quality of Life Research,2002(11):535-543.
  • 4Min SK,Lee KI,et al.Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF.Quality of Life Research,2002,1:393-600.
  • 5Tabachnick BG,Fidell LS.Using Multivariate Statistics.4th ed.Needham Heights,MA:Allyn&Bacon,1996.
  • 6Tabachnick BG.,Fidell LS.Using Multivariate Statistics.3rd edn.Harper Collins.New York,1996.
  • 7Streiner DL,Norman GR.Health measurement scales:a practical guide to their development and use.New York.Oxford University Press,1995.
  • 8Calnan M,Almond S,Smith N.Ageing and public satisfaction with the health service:an analysis of recent trends[J].Soc Sci Med,2003,57:757-762.
  • 9吴明隆.SPSS统计应用--问卷分析与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:25-28.
  • 10何裕民,沈红艺,倪红梅,龚鹏.亚健康的范畴研究[J].医学与哲学(A),2008,29(1):2-4. 被引量:46

共引文献81

同被引文献216

引证文献26

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部