期刊文献+

美国教师进步项目述评 被引量:3

The comments on the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) of America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师进步项目(TAP)是在美国国家优质教学研究所的管理和支持下建立的教育者评价—支持系统,旨在吸引专业教师、推动教师发展、留住优秀教师,最终改进所有学生的学业成就。该评价系统采取"教学技能、知识和责任评估"及"学业增值评估"二元评估维度,通过课堂观摩、小组聚会等方式为教学实践活动提供了全面具体的评价方案,一定程度上克服了传统评价方法中的弊端,将过程评价与结果评价相结合,为教师提供更多的合作机会,促进教师的专业发展。 TAP is a system for teacher and student advancement which has managed andsupported by the National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. It is a comprehensive schoolreform with the goal to attract,retain,motivate,and develop quality teachers. It has adopted"teaching skills,knowledge,and responsibilities assessment"and"academic value-addedassessment"through classroom observations,cluster group meeting,teaching support andother ways to provide a comprehensive and detailed evaluation system in teaching practice.This evaluation system has overcome the shortcomings of the traditional evaluation in theUnited States. Not only has it combined the evaluation with process and outcomes,but alsoprovided more opportunities for cooperation for teachers. It has promoted teachers' professional development. And at last it can increase all students' achievement in American.
作者 王佳佳 万姝
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期63-70,共8页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 美国 教师进步项目 教师评价 绩效奖励制度 学业增值评估 Teacher Advancement Program Teacher elevation Performance-based compensation Academic Value-added assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jerald C D,Van Hook K..More than Measurement:The TAP System's Lessons Learned for Designing Better Teacher Evaluation Systems[R].Santa Monica,CA:National Institute for Excellence in Teaching,2011:8.
  • 2TAPF.Understanding the Teacher Advancement Program[R].Santa Monica,CA:Teacher Advancement Program Foundation,2007:3-5.
  • 3王景英,梁红梅.当前美国中小学教师评价的特点及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2002,29(9):54-59. 被引量:47
  • 4Nevo,D..How can teacher benefit from teacher evaluation[J].Journal of personnel evaluation in education,1994,8(2):109-117.
  • 5Preparing teachers for the common core:aligning standards for teaching with standards for learning[EB/OL].[2013-11-16].http://www.tapsystem.org/publications/Preparing Teachers For Common Core.pdf.
  • 6Daley G.,Kim L..A Teacher Evaluation System that Works[R].National Institute for Excellence in Teaching.Santa Monica CA,2010:4.
  • 7Culbertson,J..Putting the Value in Teacher Evaluation[J].Phi Delta Kappan,2012,94(3):14-18.
  • 8Solmon L,White J T,Cohen D,et al..The Effectiveness of the Teacher Advancement Program[R].Santa Monica,CA:National Institute for Excellence in Teaching,2007:2.
  • 9Daley G.,Kim L..The effectiveness of TAP:Research summary 2012[EB/OL].[2013-11-25].http://www.tapsystem.org/publications/rb_eval.pdf.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Danielson, Charlotte. New trends in teacher evaluation[J ]. Educational leadership v. 58 No. 5, 2001,(2).
  • 2Addison Central Supervisory Union Differentiated teacher supervision and evaluation system [ J ].http: //www. acsu. k12. vt. us/supveval/, 2000,(1).
  • 3Iwanicki, Edward F. Focusing teacher evaluations on student learning [ J ]. Educational leadership v. 58 No. 5, 2001, (2).
  • 4Peterson, Kenneth D., Wahlquist, Christine. Bone,Kathie. Using more dada sources to evaluate teacher[J ]. Educational leadership v. 58 No. 5, 2001,(2).
  • 5Painter, Bryan. Using teaching portfolios [ J ]. Educational leadership v. 58 No. 5, 2001, (2).
  • 6Yoo, Seung-yoeun. Using portfolios to reflect on practice [J]. Educationl leadership v. 58 No. 5, 2001,(5).
  • 7莫景祺,朱德全.美国基础教育教师教学评价述评[J].课程.教材.教法,2001,21(3):68-71. 被引量:29
  • 8袁桂林.本届美国政府教育改革计划述评[J].外国教育研究,2001,28(6):16-24. 被引量:12

共引文献46

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部