期刊文献+

电子商务平台中的卖家甄别机制 被引量:3

Seller screening mechanism in E-commerce platforms
原文传递
导出
摘要 该文研究了电子商务平台如何通过甄别机制区分不同的卖家,并进一步分析了甄别机制对于平台收费结构和利润的影响。通过构建并求解一个双边架构的甄别模型,并进行比较静态分析,研究表明:接入费的结构与平台甄别能力密切相关,当甄别能力较弱时,平台对低质卖家收费较低甚至提供补贴。而随着甄别能力提升,平台的定价能力增强。在一定范围内,甄别能力对平台利润有正影响。因此,甄别功能的建立和完善,能够增强平台的盈利能力,提升平台价值。 This paper studies how E-commerce platforms differentiate different types of sellers via screening mechanisms and how these mechanisms affect the price structure and platform profits.Building a screening model with two-sided features and comparing static analyses show that the entry fee structure is closely related to the platform's screening ability.When the screening ability is relatively weak,the platform charges low prices to low-quality sellers and may even subsidize them.Within a certain range,the pricing power and platform profits increase as the screening ability improves.Therefore,the platform profitability and value rely heavily on the screening ability.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期1087-1091,1097,共6页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71273151)
关键词 电子商务平台 甄别机制 价格结构 信息不对称 双边市场 online shopping screening mechanism price structure asymmetric information two-sided market
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献46

  • 1周黎安,张维迎,顾全林,沈懿.信誉的价值:以网上拍卖交易为例[J].经济研究,2006,41(12):81-91. 被引量:152
  • 2吴德胜.网上交易中的私人秩序——社区、声誉与第三方中介[J].经济学(季刊),2007,6(3):859-884. 被引量:82
  • 3Akerlof, G. , 1970, "The Market for 'Lemons' : Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism", Quarterly Journal of Economics 84.
  • 4Ba, S. and P.A. Pavlou, 2002, "Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behaviour", MIS Quarterly 26 : 243--268.
  • 5Dewally, M. and L.H. Ederington, 2006, "Reputation, Certification, Warranties and Information as Remedies for Seller-buyer Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the Online Comic Book Market", Journal of Business, 79(2).
  • 6Dewan, S. and V. Hsu, 2004, "Adverse Selection in Electronic Markets: Evidence from Online Stamp Auctions", Journal of Industrial Economics 52(4): 497--516.
  • 7Eaton, D.H., 2002, "Valuing Information: Evidence from Guitar Auctions on eBay', Working Paper, Murray State University.
  • 8Heckman, J., 1979, "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error", Econometrica 47:153--161.
  • 9Hidvegi, Z., W. Wang, and A.B. Whinston, 2003, "Buy-price English Auction", Working Paper.
  • 10Houser, D. and J. Wooders, 2001, "Reputation in Auctions: Theory and Evidence from eBay", Working Paper.

共引文献294

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部