期刊文献+

双镜联合胆总管切开取石胆管一期缝合胆管自脱落支架置入术治疗胆总管结石的效果观察 被引量:3

Clinical observation of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration bile duct suture since shedding biliary stents in treatment of choledocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双镜联合胆总管切开取石胆管一期缝合胆管自脱落支架置入术治疗胆总管结石的临床效果。方法选取本院2011年1月~2014年8月收治的胆总管结石患者50例,其中20例(治疗组)行双镜联合胆总管切开取石胆管一期缝合胆管自脱落支架置入术,30例(对照组)行逆行胰胆管造影+内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开取石。比较两组的手术时间、住院时间、住院费用及并发症等。结果治疗组手术时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组住院时间、住院费用及并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论双镜联合胆总管切开取石胆管一期缝合胆管自脱落支架置入术具有手术成功率高、术后并发症少等优点,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration bile duct suture since shedding biliary stents in treatment of choledocholithiasis. Methods 50 patients with choledocholithiasis treated in our hospital From January 2011 to August 2014 were selected,20 patients(treatment group) were taken with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration bile duct suture since shedding biliary stents,30 cases(control group) were taken with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy.The operation time,length of hospital stay,hospital charges and complications of two groups were compared. Results The operation time of treatment group was longer than that of control group,the difference was significant(P〈0.05).The length of hospital stay,hospital charges and complications of two groups had no significant difference(P〉0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration bile duct suture since shedding biliary stents has higher surgical success rate,less complications,and is worth promoting in clinic.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2014年第33期162-164,167,共4页 China Modern Medicine
基金 江苏省南通市卫生局青年科研究基金项目(WQ2014037)
关键词 腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术 内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开取石术 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术 胆管自脱落支架 胆管一期缝合 Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Endoscopic sphincterotomy Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Since shedding biliary stents Bile duct suture
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献60

  • 1屠巍巍,杜卫东.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后胆漏的诊疗进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(1):92-94. 被引量:15
  • 2张豫峰.腹腔镜和胆道镜在胆总管探查取石术中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(7):68-69. 被引量:33
  • 3庞林元,潘春生,栾月云,刘畅,刘晓晨.胆总管结石内镜和开腹手术治疗对比分析[J].航空航天医药,2007,18(1):5-6. 被引量:14
  • 4MORINO M, BARACCHI F, MIGLIETTA C, et al. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones [J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(6): 889-893.
  • 5FREEMAN ML. Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2003, 5: 145-153.
  • 6BARON TH. Endoscopy for bile duct stones[J]. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol, 2005, 51(4): 289-301.
  • 7Schreurs WH,Juttmann JR,Stuifbergen WNHM,et al.Management of common bile duct stones:selectiveendoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopicsphincterotomy:short and long term results[J].SurgEndosc,2002,16(7):1068-1072.
  • 8Binmoeller KF,Schafer TW.Endoscopic management of bile duct stones[J].J Clin Gastroenterol,2001,32(2):106-118.
  • 9Rojas-Ortega S,Arizpe-Bravo D,Marín López ER,et al.Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2003,7(4):492-496.
  • 10Kong J,Wu SD,Xian GZ,et al.Complications analysis with postoperative choledochoscopy for residual bile duct stones[J].World J Surg,2010,34(3):574-580.

共引文献326

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部