期刊文献+

公共文化PPP项目中承包商机会主义行为奖惩机制演化博弈 被引量:9

Study on subsidy-punishment mechanism of contractors' opportunistic behaviors in public cultural PPP projects based on evolutionary game theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在公共文化PPP项目管理模式中,承包商为了追求自身利益在一定情况下可能会选择利用不对称信息采取机会主义行为转移项目利益,这将会损害政府建设单位的利益,影响公众的享受公共文化服务的权利,扰乱政府建设市场,因此建设单位需采取一定的管理手段来抑制承包商的机会主义行为。运用演化博弈理论分析政府建设单位应对承包商机会主义行为的演化路径,分别建立惩罚机制和补偿机制2种状态下的演化博弈模型,分别探究甲乙双方在惩罚机制和补偿机制下的演化均衡策略。结果表明,惩罚机制并未对承包商机会主义行为产生实质性的抑制效果,而补偿机制在一定条件下可显著影响承包商的机会主义行为。基于此,政府建设单位可充分利用补偿机制手段应对承包商的机会主义行为。 In public cultural PPP projects,contractors may choose to make use of asymmetric information to take opportunistic behaviors in some cases to pursue their benefits,which would be harmful to the owners interests and to the rights of the public to enjoy public culture and would even disrupt government construction market.So,the owner should take certain management tools to inhibit contractors' opportunistic behaviors.The evolutionary game theory is adopted to analyze the strategies of evolutionary equilibrium within both punishment mechanism and subsidy mechanism.The game theory is mainly used to analyze respectively the inhibitory effects of punishment mechanism and subsidy mechanism to opportunistic behaviors.The results show that punishment mechanism cannot inhibit contractors' opportunistic behaviors substantively,while subsidy mechanism can significantly affect contractors' behaviors in some cases.Based on this,the owner can make full use of subsidy mechanism to cope with contractors' opportunistic behaviors.
出处 《河北工业科技》 CAS 2014年第6期469-473,共5页 Hebei Journal of Industrial Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(71272148) 教育部高校博士点基金(20120032110039)
关键词 公共文化PPP项目 机会主义行为 奖惩机制 演化博弈 public cultural PPP projects opportunistic behaviors subsidy-punishment mechanism evolutionary game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1高杲,徐飞.管理学中机会主义的界定和辨析[J].现代管理科学,2009(10):67-69. 被引量:6
  • 2LIU D,XU W,LI H,et al.Moral hazard and adverse selection in Chinese construction tender market:A case of Wenchuan earthquake[J].Disaster Prevention and Management,2011,20(4):363-377.
  • 3SWARD A R S,LUNNAN R.Trust and control in fixed duration alliances[J].International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances,2011,2(1):41-68.
  • 4SHASH A A.Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors[J].Construction Management and Economics,1993,11(2):111-118.
  • 5MILLS A.A systematic approach to risk management for construction[J].Structural Survey,2001,19(5):245-252.
  • 6KARLSEN J T.Project owner involvement for information and knowledge sharing in uncertainty management[J].International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,2010,3(4):642-660.
  • 7任星耀,朱建宇,钱丽萍,王鹏.渠道中不同机会主义的管理:合同的双维度与关系规范的作用研究[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(3):12-21. 被引量:21
  • 8EWERHART C,FIESELER K.Procurement auctions and unit-price contracts[J].RAND Journal of Economics,2003:569-581.
  • 9CRUZ C O,MARQUES R C.Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public-private partnerships[J].International Journal of Project Management,2013,31(3):473-483.
  • 10尹贻林,徐志超,邱艳.公共项目中承包商机会主义行为应对的演化博弈研究[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(6):138-144. 被引量:36

二级参考文献98

共引文献262

同被引文献74

引证文献9

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部