期刊文献+

产品市场竞争、内部治理与智力资本价值创造效率——来自2002-2012年中国A股上市公司的经验证据 被引量:12

An Empirical Study on China's A-share Listed Firms from 2002 to 2012
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在知识经济社会,企业能否实现长期价值创造取决于其是否积极培育、有效管理智力资本要素。本文选取2002—2012年间中国A股上市公司为样本,运用面板数据回归模型考察了产品市场竞争、内部治理机制与智力资本价值创造效率间的关系。实证结果表明,激烈的产品市场竞争虽然能提升物质资本价值创造效率,却抑制了智力资本价值创造效率。而且不同的内部公司治理机制对各类资源价值创造效率存在着差异化的影响。其中,机构投资者持股是最为重要的治理机制,其有助于增进包括智力资本、物质资本在内的全要素价值创造效率。最后,本文根据实证结论针对性地提出了关于构建智力资本导向型的公司治理机制的若干建议。 In the era of knowledge economy, long-term value creation depends on whether the firm management would effectively nurture, develop and leverage the intellectual capital. This paper adopts panel data regression model to empirically examine the impacts of product market competition and various internal corporate governance mechanisms on the value added efficiency of intellectual capital with a sample of China's A-share listed firms during 2002 to 2012. It demonstrates that product market competition reduces the value added efficiency of intellectual capital though it helps to improve the value added efficiency of physical capital. And different internal governance mechanisms also have different effects on the value added efficiencies of intellectual capital and physical capital. Among them, institutional investors play the most important role on enhancing the value added efficiencies for all resource factors. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions about how to construct the intellectual capital oriented corporate governance system based on the empirical evidence.
作者 傅传锐
出处 《北京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期68-79,共12页 Social Sciences of Beijing
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(12CJY096) 福州大学科技发展基金项目(12SKQ08)
关键词 产品市场竞争 内部治理 智力资本价值创造 面板数据模型 product market competition internal corporate governance value added efficiency of intellectual capital panel data regression model
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Edvinsson L, Malone M. Intellectual Capital : Realizing Your Company' s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower [ M ]. New York: Harper Business, 1997.
  • 2Barney J B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17 (1).
  • 3Riahi-Belkaoui A. Intellectual Capital and Firm Performanee of US Multinational Firms : A Study of The Resource-based and Stakeholder Views [ J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2003, 4 (2).
  • 4Bontis N, Keow W C C, Richardson, S. Intellectual Capital and Business Performance in Malaysian Industries [ J ]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2000, 1 (1).
  • 5Tan H P, Plowman D, Hancock P. Intellectual Capital and Financial Returns of Companies [ J]. Journal of Intellectual capital, 2007, 8 (1).
  • 6蒋琰,茅宁.智力资本与财务资本:谁对企业价值创造更有效——来自于江浙地区企业的实证研究[J].会计研究,2008(7):49-55. 被引量:53
  • 7Shleifer A, Vishny R W. A Survey of Corporate Governance [ Jl. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52 (2).
  • 8Keenan J, Aggestam M. Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: Some Conceptualisations [ J ]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2001, 9 (4).
  • 9Ho C A, Williams S M. International Compara-tive Analysis of The Association between Board Structure and The Efficiency of Value Added by A Firm from Its Physical Capital and Intellectual Capital Resources [ J]. The International Journal of Accounting, 2003, 38 (4).
  • 10Zamani F G, Nahandi Y B, Lalepou M, Rezagholi- beyghi A. The Relation between Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital Stressing Human Capital Characteristic [ J] International Journal of Business and Management Tomorrow, 2012, 2 (7).

二级参考文献334

共引文献1728

同被引文献151

引证文献12

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部