基本生活需要满足：一项城市低保制度的实证研究被引量：1

Meeting Recipients' Basic Needs of Life: An Empirical Study of Minimum Living-hood Guarantee in China

导出

摘要 "中国城市低保制度绩效评估"项目实地调查数据的描述性统计结果显示,低保金额的高低并非影响基本生活需要满足度的唯一因素;回归模型的结果显示,在个人和制度层面都有若干因素能够影响低保对象对基本生活需要满足程度的主观认识。定性研究结果进一步揭示了基本生活需要的模糊外延,也即医疗、子女教育、自尊和劳动的诉求。基于上述结果,对完善低保制度乃至社会救助制度提出了政策建议。 Based on the data from the evaluation project on Urban Minimum Living-hood Guarantee （MLG） in China, this paper conducts a mixed method study of both quantitative and qualitative research, to examine whether MLG can satisfy its recipients＇ basic needs. The descriptive analysis shows that the amount of MLG benefit is not the only factor which can determine whether people feel their basic needs are met. Results generated by the Probit regression model further reveal that both at the individual level and the institutional level, there exist certain factors influencing MLG beneficiaries＇ satisfaction of basic needs. The qualitative research shows, in reality, the boundary of the concept of basic needs is rather vague. It may involve with people＇s needs for health care, children＇s education, self-dignity and working. In line with these empirical evidences, policy implications on how to improve MLG and social assistance policies are discussed.

作者郭瑜韩克庆

机构地区中国人民大学劳动人事学院

出处《社会学评论》 2014年第6期36-44,共9页 Sociological Review of China

基金中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(13XNC002)

关键词基本生活需要城市低保制度社会救助满足度 basic needs of life urban minimum living-hood guarantee social assistance satisfaction

分类号 D632.1 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Ringen, S. Direct and Indirect Measures of Poverty, Journal of Social Policy, 1988, 17(3).
2Rowntree, B. S.: Poverty: A Study of Town Life, London, Macmillian, 1991.
3Streeten, P. First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in the Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981,10-15.
4Alcock, P. Erskine, A. & May, M. Dictionary of Social Policy. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2002, p. 158.
5Taylor-Gooby, P. Needs, Welfare and Political Allegiance, In Timms, N. & D .Watson (eds). Social Welfare: Why and How? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1980.
6中国科学院可持续发展战略研究组:((2012中国可持续发展战略报告》,北京,科学出版社,2012.
7Soper, K. On Human Needs, Brighton: Harvester Press. 1981, p. 2-5.
8Bradshaw, J.R. The concept of social need, New Society,1972 (19).
9王征,唐钧,张时飞.要重视城市居民的“基本生活需要”——中国七城市的调查[J].中国党政干部论坛,2005(7):36-38. 被引量：5
10Renwick, T. & Bergmann, B. A Budget-Based Definition of Poverty: With an Application to Single-Parent Families, The Jour- nal of Human Resources,1993, 28(1).

二级参考文献59

1李艳军,王瑜.补缺型社会福利——中国社会福利制度改革的新选择[J].西安电子科技大学学报（社会科学版）,2007,17(2):99-104. 被引量：5
2《重庆晨报》,2009,《有劳动能力还吃低保——或将设半年至一年过渡期》5月21日.
3《南方日报》,2010,《佛山禅城:有劳动能力不就业将取消低保资格》4月28日.
4《新京报》,2006,《北京朝阳政协委员建议对有劳动能力者降低低保》12月14日.
5中华人民共和国民政部,2011,《2010年社会服务发展统计报告》,民政部门户网站.
6Ayala,L.&M.Rodríguez2007,“What Determines Exit from Social Assistance in Spain?”International Journal of Social Welfare16.
7Beaulieu,N.,J.Y.Duclos,B.Fortin&M.Rouleau2005,“Intergenerational Reliance on SocialAssistance:Evidence from Canada.”Journal of Population Economics18(3).
8Cooke,M.2009,“A Welfare Trap?The Duration and Dynamics of Social Assistance Use amongLone Mothers in Canada.”Canadian Review of Sociology46(3).
9Dean,H.2003,“The Third Way and Social Welfare:The Myth of Post-Emotionalism.”SocialPolicy and Administration37(7).
10Department of Social Security(DSS)1998,New Ambitions for Our Country:A New Contract forWelfare.London:The Stationery Office.