Bruton与Truscott二语写作语法纠错之争被引量：10

The debate between Bruton and Truscott on grammar correction in L2 writing

导出

摘要纠正性反馈已经成为应用语言学研究的示范性议题,同时可能也是该领域最具争议的研究议题之一。本文围绕二语写作语法纠错(又称"书面纠正性反馈")的Bruton与Truscott之争,回顾了该争论的大致过程,梳理了双方在纠错效果、纠错研究方法等关键问题上的基本观点,同时分析了各自论争的出发点与逻辑。文章最后就书面纠正性反馈及其研究提出了自己的思考,以期对未来二语习得与二语写作研究有所启发。 Corrective feedback has become an exemplary topic and one of the most controversial issues in applied linguistics. This article takes as its object of study the debate between Bruton and Truscott on grammar correction in L2 writing(or written corrective feedback). After briefly describing the process of the debate,it presents the views of the two parties on such major issues as the effectiveness of grammar correction and the design of grammar correction research. It then analyzes their points of departure and logic of argumentation in the debate. Finally, some reflections are offered on written corrective feedback, in the hope of shedding some light on further studies on L2 writing in particular and on SLA in general.

作者苏建红

机构地区江苏大学

出处《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期855-863,874,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"中国大学生EFL书面纠错反馈效果研究"(11YJA740077) 江苏省社会科学基金课题"学习者认知因素和教学方式显性程度对外语学习的交互作用研究"(12YYD018)的阶段性成果

关键词二语写作语法纠错书面纠正性反馈书面纠错研究 grammar correction in L2 writing written corrective feedback written corrective research

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Belcher, D. 2013. The scope of L2 writing: Why we need a wider lens [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 22: 438-439.
2Brewer, M. B. 2000. Research design and issues of validity [A]. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (eds.). Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology [ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-16.
3Brown, D. 2012. The written corrective feedback debate: Next steps for classroom teachers and Practitioners [J]. TESOL 46(4) : 861-867.
4Bruton, A. 2009a. Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 18(2) : 136-140.
5Bruton, A. 2009b. Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were… [J]. System 37(4) : 600-613.
6Bruton, A. 2010. Another reply to Truscott on error correction: Improved situated designs over statistics [J]. System 38(3) : 491-498.
7DeKeyser, R. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning [A]. In C. Doughty & M. Long (eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Learning [ C ]. Oxford: Blackwell, 313-348.
8Ellis, R. 2002. Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2) : 223-236.
9Ellis, R. 2006. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective [J]. TESOL Quarterly 40(1) : 83-107.
10Ellis, R. 2010. Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2) : 335-349.

二级参考文献18

1Baker, C. 2006. Foundation of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism [M]. London: Multilingual Matters.
2Barton, D. & M. Hamilton. 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community [M]. London.. Routledgc.
3Bernstein, B. 1977. Class, Codes and Control [M]. London.. Routledge.
4Brandt, D. 2001. Literacy in American Lives [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
5Gee, J. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses [M]. London: Taylor & Francis.
6Gee, J. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis [M]. London: Routledge.
7Gregory, E. &A. Williams. 2000. City Literacies : Learning to Read across Generations and Cultures[M]. London: Routledge.
8Hamilton, M. 2001. Expanding the new literacy studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as social practice [A]. In M. Hamilton, D. Barton&R, Ivanic (eds.). Situated Literacie,r.. Reading and Writing in Context [C]. London: Routledgc. 16-34.
9Hornberger, N. 2003. Continua of Biliteracy: An Ecological Framework for Educational Policy, Research and Practice in Multilingual Settings [C]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
10Hunt, R. &A. Brychta. 2008. Good English [M]. Beijing: Qunyan Press.