期刊文献+

社交焦虑高、低分者事后反复回想的信息加工差异 被引量:2

Difference in Post Event Rumination between High-Level and Low-Level Social Anxiety Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考察社交焦虑高分者和低分者在社交紧张事件后的事后反复回想过程中,在一般和特殊这两个信息加工维度上是否存在差异。由于一般和特殊的事后反复回想的编码没有标准,故设计研究一,为研究二的编码工作做准备。研究一以8名在校大学生为被试,进行半结构性访谈,了解在校大学生在社交紧张事件之后的事后反复回想内容,并对此进行分类,形成开放式问卷。研究二以45名在校大学生为被试,用开放性问卷收集被试在近期的一个社交紧张/焦虑事件后的想法,根据研究一设定编码规则,然后对这些想法进行编码,考察高、低社交焦虑水平者的想法在一般和特殊的信息加工维度上是否存在差异。研究发现,在校大学生在日常的社交紧张/焦虑事件后,事后反复回想可以分为回忆当时的情境、反事实假设、猜测结果、分析原因、总结规律、制订计划等几类,并得到两个主要结果:1)高社交焦虑者一般的事后反复回想占总想法的比例比低社交焦虑者的高,差异边缘显著;2)一般的事后反复回想占总想法的比例与社交焦虑量表得分呈中等程度的正相关。 The research aimed to explore the difference in general processing and special processing of post event rumination between high-level and low-level social anxiety students. There is no coding rule for distinction of general and special post event ruminations, so the first study is prepared for the second study's coding rule. In the first study, a semi-structured interview was conducted to 8 college students concerning their post event rumination thoughts after they had experienced a social anxiety event. The thoughts were then classified into different categories. In the second study, 45 college students were asked to fill up an open-end questionnaire collecting their post event rumination thoughts after a social anxiety event. The collected thoughts in the questionnaire were then coded. The general and special post event rumination thoughts were compared between high-level and low-level social anxiety students. Two major results and conclusions were: 1) The rate of general post event rumination in high-level social anxiety students was larger than those in low-level social anxiety students, the difference was significant marginally. 2) The rate of general post event rumination was positively correlated with the social anxiety level of students.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1115-1123,共9页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 国家自然科学基金(31170991)资助
关键词 社交焦虑 事后反复回想 一般信息加工 特殊信息加工 情绪 social anxiety post event rumination general processing special processing emotion
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Murray B S, Dan J S. Social anxiety disorder. Lancet, 2008, 371:1115-1125.
  • 2Brozovich F, Heimberg R G. An analysis of post- event processing in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 2008, 28(6): 891-903.
  • 3Kashdan T B, Roberts J E. Social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and post-event rumination: affective consequences and social contextual in fluences. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2007, 21(3): 284-301.
  • 4Clark D M, Wells A. A cognitive model of social phobia//Heimberg R, Liebowitz M, Hope D A, et al. Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 1995:69-93.
  • 5Philippot P, Neumann A, Vrielynck N. Emotion information processing and affect regulation: specificity matters! //Vandekerkhove M, von Scheve S, Ismer S, et al. Regulating emotions: culture social necessity and biological inheritance. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 2007:189-209.
  • 6Vrielynck N, Philippot P. Regulating emotion during imaginal exposure to social anxiety: impact of the specificity of information processing. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2009, 40(2): 274-282.
  • 7Philippot P, Vrielynck N, Muller V. Cognitive processing specificity of anxious apprehension: impacton distress and performance during speech exposure. Behavior Therapy, 2010, 41(4): 575-586.
  • 8Vassilopoulos S P. Social anxiety and ruminative self- focus. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2008, 22: 860- 867.
  • 9Vassilopoulos S P, Watkins E R. Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus: a pilot extension study with individuals high and low in fear of negative evaluation. Behavior Therapy, 2009, 40(2): 181-189.
  • 10Philippot P, Baeyens C, Douilliez, C. Specifying emotional information: regulation of emotional intensity. Emotion, 2005, 6(4): 560-571.

二级参考文献9

  • 1王伟,高平青,郭丽英,程楠,解亚宁,刘晓秋.武警新兵交往焦虑状况调查[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(2):164-165. 被引量:3
  • 2汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.134-142,161-167.
  • 3American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.4th edition.Washington,DC:American Psychiatric Association,2000
  • 4Heimberg RG,Mueller GP,Holt CS,et al.Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others:The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.Behavior Therapy,1992,23:53-75
  • 5Brown EJ,Turovsky J,Heimberg RG,et al.Validation of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale across the anxiety disorders.Psychological Assessment,1997,9:21-27
  • 6Mattick RP,Clarke JC.Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1998,36:455 -470
  • 7Musa C,Kostogianni N,Lepine JP.The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE):Psychometric properties of the French version,Encephale,2004,30(6):517-524
  • 8刘兴华,钱铭怡.社交恐惧症的评估方法[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(3):179-181. 被引量:14
  • 9彭纯子,范晓玲,李罗初.社交回避与苦恼量表在学生群体中的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(4):279-281. 被引量:92

共引文献57

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部