摘要
《侵权责任法》在更高法律位阶上改变了适用近十年的《证据规定》中的医疗损害责任举证责任倒置的原则,并试图辅之以第58条过错推定制度为代表的系列缓和制度以平衡医患举证责任强度。然而,《侵权责任法》中因果关系证明责任制度的模糊甚至是矛盾以及相关配套程序制度的缺位,导致了第58条等系列制度在实践中面临种种困境。而借鉴他国成功经验建立系统的举证责任缓和制度应当是解决问题的有效途径。
The Tort Liability Law changed for nearly a decade of medical damage liability principle of inversion burden of proof. And try to accompany the represented Article58 to balance the burden of proof between victim patient and medical facility. However, the causation in Tort Liability Law is very vague and even contradictory, as well as the absence of related application systems, Lead to the Article 58 facing various difficulties in practice. Reference from foreign successful experience, establish the burden of proof to ease should be a effective way to solve the problem.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期174-181,共8页
Hebei Law Science
基金
海南省人文医学研究基地2014年基金项目<医疗诉讼中的证明标准研究>(QRYPT201402)
海南医学院2014年科研培育基金项目<医疗诉讼证据制度研究>(HY2013-27)
关键词
侵权责任法
医疗损害责任
因果关系
举证责任缓和
举证责任倒置
Tort Liability Law
liability for medical damages, causation, ease the burden of proof
inversion burden of proof