期刊文献+

临床研究中群体伦理与个体伦理矛盾的随机化解决方案

下载PDF
导出
摘要 伦理学是临床研究过程中必须面对的问题,而群体伦理与个体伦理又是临床研究伦理学中既互相牵制又必须要使其最大程度实现和谐统一的一对矛盾体。本文主要介绍了两种用于调解与中和临床研究中群体伦理与个体伦理的方法,即区组反应变量-适应性随机化方法与改变RPW原则中参数设置的方法,以及两种方法缓和群体伦理与个体伦理矛盾的效果比较。希望能够抛砖引玉,为后续相关研究提供参考。
出处 《中国医院统计》 2014年第5期357-358,共2页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Heilig CM, Weijer C. A critical history of individual and collective ethics in the lineage of Lellouch and Schwartz[J]. Clin Trials,2005, 2(3) :244-253.
  • 2Pullman D, Wang XK. Adaptive designs, informed consent, and the ethics of research [ J ]. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2001,22 ( 3 ) : 203- 210.
  • 3Pocock SJ, Hughes MD. Practical problems in interim analyses, with particular regard to estimation[J]. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1989, 10(4 Suppl) :209-221.
  • 4Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Randomization in clinical trials : Theory and practice[M]. New York : John Wiley & Sons Inc,2002 : 169-189.
  • 5British Medical Association. Medical Ethics Today [M]. London: BMJ Publishing, 1993:330-333.
  • 6Palmer CR, Rosenberger WF. Ethics and Practice: Alternative de- signs for phase 111 randomized clinical trials [J]. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1999,20(2 ) : 172-186.
  • 7Poon KY, Lie CC. Clinical Trial Randomization Design: Blocked Randomized Response Adaptive Method (Poster) [C]. San Francis- co, CA : WUSS 11 th Annual Conference, 2003.
  • 8Yu LL, Wang SZ, Xue FB, et al. Comparison of Two Methods to Mitigate the Conflict between Collective and Individual Ethics in Clin- ical Trial[J]. Journal of US-China Medical Science ,2006,3 (6) :40- 45.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部