从视觉科学史看科学与艺术的同源性和同质性被引量：3

Homology and Homogeneousness of Science and Art:An Investigation from the Perspective of Visual Historiography of Science

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过对近几十年的视觉科学史中关于科学图像的研究进行回顾,提出现代科学与艺术在历史上具有深刻的同源性,在认知模式上具有深刻的同质性。认为欧洲文艺复兴是现代科学与艺术的共同起源,而科学与艺术对事物进行观察、描述(描绘)1和解释的共同旨趣几乎贯穿了整个人类历史,直到一百多年前才出现了科学与艺术相互分裂的现象。 Based on the review of the researches of the scientific images in the visual historiography of science in recent decades, it was suggested in this paper that modern science and art have deep homology in the history and homogeneousness in cognitive paradigms. The European Renaissance is regarded as the common origin of modern science and art, while the observation, description and explanation about things is regarded as the same objective of science and art for almost all of the history of human. It is not until more than 100 years ago did the division betweenscience and art emerge.

作者宋金榜刘兵

机构地区上海交通大学科学史与科学文化研究院清华大学社会科学学院科学技术与社会研究所

出处《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期92-99,共8页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

关键词视觉科学史视觉科学表象科学与艺术同源性同质性 visual historiography of science visual representation of science science and art homology homogeneousness

分类号 N09 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1江晓原:《艺术:在本质上能和科学相通吗?》,《科学时报》,2007-9-14.
2Caroline A.Jones andPeter Galison(eds.):Picturing Science,Producing Art.New York:Routledge,1998,p.2.
3Sheryl R.Ginn and Lorenzo Lorusso,“Brain,Mind,and Body Interactions With Art in Renaissance Italy”.Journal of the History of the Neurosciences.2008,17(3):p.295.
4Horst Bredekamp,“Gazing Hands and Blind Spots:Galileo as Draftsman”.Science in Context.2001,14,Supplement S1:pp.178-179.
5Horst Bredekamp,“Gazing Hands and Blind Spots:Galileo as Draftsman”.Science in Context.2001,14,Supplement S1:pp.179.
6John W.Shirley andF.David Hoeniger(ed.),Science and the Arts in the Renaissance.London:Associated University Presses,1985,p.15.
7Alistair C.Crombie,“Science and the Arts in the Renaissance:The Search for Truth and Certainty,Old and New”.John W.Shirley andF.David Hoeniger(ed.),Science and the Arts in the Renaissance.pp.15-16.
8Renzo Baldasso,“The Role of Visual Representation in the Scientific Revolution:A Historiographic Inquiry”.Centaurus.2006,48:p.70.
9Martin Kemp,Visualizations:the Nature Book of Art and Science.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000,p.4.
10Martin Kemp and Marina Wallace.Spectacular Bodies:the Art and Science of the Human Body From Leonardo to Now.Los Angeles:University of California Press,2000,p.11.