摘要
目的观察心俞、厥阴俞烧山火治疗心阳不振型心脏早搏的临床疗效。方法将114例心阳不振型心脏早搏患者随机分为A组、B组和C组,每组38例。A组针刺心俞、厥阴俞,行烧山火手法;B组针刺内关、神门、通里、巨阙、膻中等穴,行平补平泻手法;C组针刺悬钟、阳陵泉,行烧山火手法。3组均每日治疗1次,10次为1个疗程。治疗4个疗程后,比较各组动态心电图及临床疗效。结果 A组总有效率为76.3%,B组为31.6%,C组为23.7%,A组总有效率与B组和C组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。A组治疗前后病情分级经Ridit分析,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。B组和C组治疗前后病情分级经Ridit分析,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论心俞、厥阴俞烧山火是一种治疗心阳不振型心脏早搏的有效方法。
Objective To observe the efficacy of heat-producing needling at Xinshu(BL 15) and Jueyinshu(BL 14) in treating premature heart beat due to heart-yang deficiency. Methods Totally 114 patients with premature heart beat due to heart-yang deficiency were randomized into group A, group B, and group C, 38 in each group. Group A was intervened by using heat-producing needling method at Xinshu(BL 15) and Jueyinshu(BL 14); group B was by acupuncture at Neiguan(PC 6), Shenmen(HT 7), Tongli(HT 5), Juque(CV 14), Danzhong(CV 17), etc. with moderate needling manipulations; group C was by using heat-producing needling method at Xuanzhong(GB 39) and Yanglingquan(GB 34). In all 3 groups, the treatment was given once per day, 10 sessions as a treatment course. Four courses later, the dynamic electrocardiogram(ECG) result and clinical efficacies were compared. Results The total effective rate was 76.3% in group A, significantly different from 31.6% in group B and 23.7% in group C(P〈0.01). By Ridit analysis, the change of disease grading in group A after intervention was statistically significant(P〈0.01); there were no significant changes in disease grading after intervention between group B and group C(P 〉0.05). Conclusion Heat-producing needling at Xinshu(BL 15) and Jueyinshu(BL 14) is effective in treating premature heart beat due to heart-yang deficiency.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2014年第11期1008-1010,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
针刺疗法
烧山火
穴
心俞
穴
厥阴俞
期外收缩
Acupuncture therapy
Heat-producing needling
Point
Xinshu(BL 15)
Point
Jueyinshu(BL 14)
Cardiac complexes
premature