期刊文献+

应用MECLOR对严重事故实验Phebus FPT3的模拟分析 被引量:1

Simulation and Analysis of Severe Accident Experiment Phebus FPT3 With MECLOR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用MECLOR1.8.6程序对严重事故实验Phebus FPT3进行了模拟分析。通过建模计算,得到了严重事故过程中燃料棒的行为,氢气的产生,裂变产物的释放、迁移和沉降及安全壳的热工水力响应等相关数据。计算值与实验值的对比分析表明,燃料棒的行为、氢气产生的时间和趋势及安全壳的热工水力响应与实验值吻合良好。由于相应程序模型的限制,最终产氢的总量及裂变产物相关的计算值与实验值有所不同。其中,计算的氢气总量较实验值偏小,计算的裂变产物释放量和在安全壳中的沉降量大多较实验值稍高。此外,还利用快速傅里叶变换方法(FFTBM)对整个建模计算进行了详细的定量化评估。 The severe accident experiment Phebus FPT3 was simulated and analyzed by using MECLOR1.8.6 .The fuel rod behavior ,the hydrogen production ,the release , transport and deposition of fission products ,and the thermo‐hydraulic condition in the containment were calculated .The comparison between calculation results and experi‐ment data show s that the rod behavior ,the hydrogen production time and trend ,and the thermo‐hydraulic condition in the containment fit quite well .But the total quantity of hydrogen production and the fission product relative data have some differences betw een the calculation results and experiment data ,because of some limits of the model in the code .The calculated total quantity of hydrogen production is smaller than that of the experiment ,and most of the calculation results about the release and deposition of the fission products are a little bigger than those of the experiment .Besides ,the accura‐cy quantification of the calculation was evaluated with the fast Fourier transform based method (FFTBM ) .
作者 王高鹏 周喆
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期2017-2022,共6页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
关键词 严重事故 Phebus FPT3 裂变产物 快速傅里叶变换方法 severe accident Phebus FPT3 fission product FFTBM
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1HERRANZ I. E, VELA-GARIA M, FONTA NET J, et al. Experimental interpretation and code validation based on the PHEBUS-FP pro- gramme: Lessons learnt from the analysis of the containment scenario of FPT1 and FPT2 tests [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237:2 210-2 218.
  • 2MARTIN-FUERTES F, BARBERO R, MAR TIN VALDEPENAS R B, et al. Analysis of source term aspects in the experiment Phebus FPT1 with the MELCOR and CFX codes[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237: 509-523.
  • 3GYENES G, AMMIRABILE L. Containment analysis on the Phebus FPT-0, FPT-1 and FPT-2 experiments[J]. Nuclear Engineering and De- sign, 2011, 241:854 -864.
  • 4KISSANE M P, DROSIK I. Interpretation of fission-product transport behaviour in the Phebus FPT0 and FPT1 tests[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2006, 236:1 210-1 223.
  • 5KONTAUTAS A, URBONAVICIUS E. Analy sis of aerosol deposition in PHEBUS containment during FPT-1 experiment[J]. Nuclear Engineer- ing and Design, 2009, 239:1 267-1 274.
  • 6GIRAULT N, DICKINSON S, FUNKE F, et al. Iodine behaviour under LWR accident condi- tions: Lessons learnt from analyses of the first two Phebus FP tests[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2006, 236:1 293-1 308.
  • 7MICAELLI J C. Phebus FP FPT3: Final report [R]. France: IRSN, 2011.
  • 8MELCOR Computer Code Manuals, Vol. 1: Primer and users & guides, version i. 8.6[R]. US: Sandia National Laboratories, 2005.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部