“违禁作品”的法理分析

The Legal Analysis of "Illegal Works"

对于违禁作品的讨论迄今仍未达成共识,值得进一步深入研究。学界主要争议集中在以下三点:违禁作品的概念问题、著作权问题和保护问题。违禁作品应指内容违法的作品。有学者从程序和实体、公法和私法的角度对于违禁作品所做的实证意义上的界定,客观上进一步加大了对违禁作品的保护力度。违禁作品在著作权法范围内享有完全著作权;但当作品的出版传播与公共利益相冲突时,则需要予以公法上的限制。关于违禁作品著作权的保护,应采权利行使限制说。著作权人有权主张侵犯著作人身权的精神损害赔偿,无权主张与著作财产权益相关的损失赔偿。

The discussion about illegal works has not reached a consensus, which is quite worthy of further in - depth study. Academic major controversy focuses on the following three points ： the problem of illegal works of the concept, copyright and protection. The prohibited products should refer to the illegal contents. Some scholars define the concept of illegal works from the perspective of procedure and entity, public and private law, which is not convincing. Prohibited works enjoyed copyright completely within the scope of copyright law; however, when the publication and dissemination of the work conflict with the public interest, the need is limited on the public law. The protection about illegal copyright shah adopt the theory of right exercise restrictions; the copyright owner has no right to claim damages.