期刊文献+

手足口病肠道病毒阳性检出率的相关因素分析 被引量:6

The related factors on positive rate of enterovirus in HFMD
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解手足口病病原阳性检出率的相关因素。方法在2011年4月-2013年11月,通过监测哨点医院收集全市手足口病病例的咽拭子和血清标本1 522人份,并填写病例相关基本信息,采用荧光定量RT-PCR方法对标本进行核酸检测,分析肠道病毒阳性检出率的相关因素。结果 1 522人份标本中,肠道病毒阳性927份,其中EV71阳性379份,Cox A16阳性137份,其他肠道病毒阳性411份,总阳性率为60.9%。咽拭子标本的阳性率(61.37%)高于血清(28.81%),发病3 d内的标本阳性率(62.81%)高于3 d以上的标本(52.04%),岛内(66.71%)和近岛(65.69%)医院的标本阳性率高于岛外(44.47%)医院,随着发病年龄的增加,阳性检出率先升高后下降。结论标本类型、标本采集时间、医院地理位置、患者年龄与肠道病毒阳性检出率相关。 Objective To investigate the related factors contributing to positive rate of enterovirus which result in Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease(HFMD).Methods During April 2011 to November 2013,1 522 samples of HFMD cases were collected from all surveillance hospitals,including throat swabs and serum specimen,and related information was recorded.Realtime RT-PCR was applied to detect the nucleic acid of enterovirus and related factors on positive rate of enterovirus was analyzed.Results 927 samples of 1 522 were found to have enterovirus DNA,included 379 samples of EV71,136 samples of Cox A16 and411 samples of other enterovirus,the positive rate was 60.9%,of which throat swabs(61.37%) were higher than serums(28.81%),samples within three days of onset(62.81%) were higher than those collected after three days of onset(52.04%),hospitals in the main island(66.71%) and adjacent areas(65.69%) was higher than that of hospitals in rural area(44.47%),the corresponding rate among was first up then down with the increasing of patient age.Conclusion Sample type,the collection time of samples,hospital location and patient age are the related factors on positive rate of enterovirus.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 北大核心 2014年第22期3251-3253,3256,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 手足口病 肠道病毒 检出率 相关因素 Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease(HFMD) Enterovirus Positive rate Related factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.卫生部办公厅关于印发《手足口病诊疗指南(2010年版)》的通知.2010-04-20.
  • 2Kares S, L nnmt M, Vuorinen P, et al. Real - time PCR for rapid diagnosis of entero - and rhinovirus infections using light cycler [J]. J C/in Virol, 2004, 29(2) : 99 -104.
  • 3Capaul SE, Gorgievski - Hrisohol M. Detection of entemvirus RNA incere bmspin alfluid (CSF) using Nucli Sens EasyQ Entemvirus assay[J]. J Clin Virol,2005,32(3) :236 -240.
  • 4Fuhrman JA, Liang X, Noble RT. Rapid detectionof enteroviruses in small volumes of natural waters by real - time quantitative reversetranscriptase PCIt[ J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71 ( 8 ) : 4523 - 4530.
  • 5Chen TC, Chen GW, Hsiung CA, et al. Combining multiplex re- verse transcription -PCR and a diagnostic microarray to detect and differentiate enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 [ J]. J Clin Mi- crobiol, 2006, 44(6) : 2212 -2219.
  • 6Tan EL, Chow VTK, Kumarasinghe G, et al. Specific detection of enterovirus 71 directly from clinical specimens using real - time RT - PCR hybridization probe assay [ J ]. Mol Cell Probes, 2006, 20 (2) : 135 -140.
  • 7Luo ST, Chiang PS, Chao AS, et al. Enterovirus 71 maternal anti- bodies in infants, Taiwan[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2009, 15 (4) : 581 - 584.
  • 8Ooi EE, Phoon MC, Ishak B, et aL Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71, Singapore[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2002, 8 (9) : 995 - 997.
  • 9Rabenau HF, Richter M, Doerr HW. Hand, foot and mouth dis- ease: seroprevalence of Coxsackie AI6 and Enterovirus 71 in Ger- many[J]. Ned Microbiol Immunol, 2010, 199(1) : 45 -51.
  • 10Knipe DM, HoMey PM, Diane E, et al. Fields virology(12th) [ M]. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007:857 - 858.

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部