期刊文献+

瑞替普酶治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死临床疗效观察 被引量:3

Therapeutic Effect of Reteplase on ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察基层医院应用瑞替普酶对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死治疗的临床疗效及安全性.方法将2011年1月至2013年12月屯留县人民医院收治的95例符合溶栓治疗的急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者分为2组:瑞替普酶组(54例)和尿激酶组(41例).瑞替普酶组患者给予瑞替普酶18 mg静脉滴注,30 min后重复上述剂量1次,尿激酶组患者给予尿激酶150万U溶栓,30 min内静滴完成.比较2组的溶栓冠脉再通率、心血管并发症、再闭塞、出血、死亡率.结果瑞替普酶与尿激酶组比较,血管再通率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).2组心血管并发症、再闭塞、出血、死亡率差异无统计学意义.结论瑞替普酶治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死冠脉再通时间早、冠脉再通率高、给药方便、药物维持时间长、不良反应少,是一种高效而安全的溶栓药物. Objective To evulate the therapeutic effect and safety of reteplase in treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Methods Ninety-five patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who admitted in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013 were divided into 2 groups: reteplase group(54cases) and urokinase group(41 cases). Patients in reteplase group were intravenous injection of 18 mg of reteplase for twice, and the interval was 30 minute, and patients in urokinase group were given intravenous injection of1500,000 U urokinase in 30 minutes. The recanalization rate of coronary artery, the incidence of cardiovascular complications, reocclusion, hemorrhage and mortality were compared between two groups. Results There was statistically significant difference in the recanalization rate of coronary artery between two groups(P〈0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of cardiovascular complications, reocclusion,hemorrhage and mortality between two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion Reteplase is a highly active and safe thrombolytic drug in treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with earlier recanalization,higher recanalization rate of coronary artery,more convenient administration way,longer maintaining time and less adverse reactions.
出处 《昆明医科大学学报》 CAS 2014年第10期76-78,共3页 Journal of Kunming Medical University
基金 山西省科技计划攻关项目(20130313016-16)
关键词 瑞替普酶 尿激酶 心肌梗死 Reteplase Urokinase Myocardial infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1应站专,周华琴.高龄老年人急性心肌梗塞早期溶栓30例临床观察[J].承德医学院学报,2005,22(4):311-312. 被引量:8
  • 2急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 3中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗方案[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(157):329-329.
  • 4罗晓菡,段新杰.135例急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗的临床分析[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(8):724-724. 被引量:7
  • 5American Heart Association / Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees.Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care,part Ⅲ:adult advanced cardiac life support[J].JAMA,1992,268(16):2199-2241.
  • 6GISSI.Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatmeut in acute myocardial infarction[J].Lancet,1986,1(8478):397-402.
  • 7Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myoeardial infarction : ISIS-2. ISIS-2 ( Second International Study of Infarct Survival ) Collaborative Group [ J ]. Lancet, 1988, 2 (8607) :349 - 360.
  • 8叶任高,陆再英.内科学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:787-788.
  • 9王洪艳,赵辉,余波急性心肌梗死在急诊室内应用瑞替普酶疗效观察24例[J].中国医药指南,2010,8(14):267-269.
  • 10沈卫峰,沈迎,张奇.改善急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的生存链[J].国际心血管病杂志,2007,34(6):391-394. 被引量:7

共引文献27

同被引文献14

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部