期刊文献+

前列腺癌放疗的摆位误差分析 被引量:7

Analysis of set-up errors during radiotherapy of prostate cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨前列腺癌仰卧位放疗时左右、头脚、前后方向的摆位误差及各方向的旋转误差。方法收集2011年10月至2013年6月接受前列腺癌根治性放疗的患者25例,采用仰卧位体模固定,锥形束CT(CBCT)骨配准校位,分析左右、头脚、前后方向的平均摆位误差及各方向的平均旋转误差。结果全放疗疗程中每例患者校位9次,共计225次。各方向的平均摆位误差:左右(0.19±0.18)cm,头脚(0.36±0.30)cm,前后(0.21±0.16)cm;其中左右方向摆位误差≥5mm占5.8%,头脚占24.3%,前后占8.0%。各方向旋转误差:轴位(1.07±1.03)°,头脚(0.82±0.66)°,水平(0.79±0.68)°。前5次与后4次摆位及旋转误差比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论前列腺癌仰卧位放疗时,头脚摆位误差最大,左右及前后摆位误差相当,旋转误差较小可忽略不计。 Objective To analyze the set-up errors in the left-right( LR, X axis) , superoinferior ( SI, Y axis) and antero-posterior (AP, Z axis) directions and the rotations during radiotherapy of prostate cancer in the supine position. Methods Twenty-five prostate cancer patients who received radiotherapy from October 2011 to June 2013 were analyzed. All the patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT) in the supine position after external immobilization using thermoplastic shell. Measurements for set-up errors and rotations in X, Y, Z directions were collected from daily image-guided radiotherapy( IGRT, bony match) pre-treatment. The set-up errors and rotations were analyzed. Results Each patient received 9 fractions of measurement with a total of 225 fractions. Mean set-up errors were (0. 19±0. 18)cm, (0. 36±0. 30)cm, and(0. 21±0. 16)cm in the X, Y and Z axes, respectively. The set-up errors of≥5 mm was 5. 8%, 24. 3%, and 8. 0% of all measured fractions in the X, Y and Z axes, respectively. Mean rota-tions were (1. 07±1. 03)°, (0. 82±0. 66)°, and (0. 79±0. 68)°in the axis, vertical, and lateral directions, respectively. After com-paring the first 5 and the following 4 set-up and rotation errors, there were no significant differences( P〉0. 05) . Conclusion The set-up errors is larger in the Y than in the X and Z axes during radiotherapy of prostate cancer in the supine position. The rotation errors are much smaller and can be omitted.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2014年第10期910-912,共3页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
基金 北京希望马拉松专项基金资助项目(LC2013A01) 首都临床特色应用研究资助项目(Z131107002213010)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 仰卧位 放射治疗 摆位误差 Prostate neoplasms Supine Radiotherapy Set-up errors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Fenoglietto P, Laliberte B, Allaw A, et al. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs- at-risk [ J ]. Radiother Oncol, 2008, 88 ( 1 ) : 77- 87.
  • 2Al-Mamgani A, Heemsbergen WD, Peeters ST, et al. Role of in- tensity-modulated radiotherapy in reducing toxicity in dose esca- lation for localized prostate cancer [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 73(3):685-691.
  • 3Langsenlehner T, Doller C, Winkler P, et al. Impact of inter-and intrafraction deviations and residual set-up errors on PTV margins [ J]. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie,2013,189(4) :321-328.
  • 4Duffton A, McNee S, Muirhead R, et al. Clinical commissioning of online seed matching protocol for prostate radiotherapy[ J]. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(1020) : 1273-1281.
  • 5Greer PB, Dahl K, Ebert MA, et al. Comparison of prostate set- up accuracy and margins with off-line bony anatomy corrections and online implanted fiducial-based corrections [ J ]. J Med Ima- ging Radiat Oncol, :2008, 52(5) :511-516.
  • 6Graf R., Wust P, Budach V, et al. Potentials of on-llne reposi- tioning based on implanted fiducial markers and electronic portal imaging in prostate cancer radiotherapy [ J ]. Radiat Oncol, 2009, 4(13) :1-9.
  • 7Gill S, Thomas J, Fox C, et al. Electronic portal imaging vs kilo- voltage imaging in fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of set-up uncertainties [ J ]. Br J Ra- diol, 2012, 85(1010):176-182.
  • 8Ikeda I, Mizowaki T, Sawada Y, et al. Assessment of interfrac- tional prostate motion in patients immobilized in the prone position using a thermoplastic shell[J/OL]. J Radiat Res, 2013 [2014-07-22]. http ://www. researchgate. net/publication/249- 966211.

同被引文献65

  • 1Chung HT, Xia P, Linda W, et al. Does image-guided radiotherapy improve toxicity profile in whole pelvic-treated high-risk prostate cancer comparison between IG-IMRT and IMRT[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2009, 73 (1):53-60.
  • 2Perks JR, Lehmann J, Chen AM,et al. Comparison of peripheral dose from image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using KV cone beam CT to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)[J].Radiother Oncol.2008, 89(3):304-310.
  • 3McKenzie A,van Herk M,Mijnheer B, et al. Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy[J].Radiotherapy Oncol.2002,62(3):299-307.
  • 4Tyagi N, Lewis JH, Yashar CM, et al. Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2011,80(1):273-280.
  • 5Barney BM, Lee RJ, Handrahan D, et al. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2011, 80(1):301-305.
  • 6BAADE P D, YOULDEN D R, KRNJACKI L J]. International epidemiology of prostate cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends [ J ]. Mol Nutr Food Res, 2009, 53(2): 171 - 184.
  • 7WILKINS A, MOSSOP H, SYNDIKUS I, et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase3 CHHiP trial[ J]. Lancet Oncok 2015, 16(16): 1605-1616.
  • 8MD-6000膀胱超声测容仪使用说明书[Z].天津迈达医学科技股份有限公司,2015:3-4.
  • 9VAN HERK M, PLOEGER L, SONKE J J, et al. A novel method for megavoltage scatter correction in cone-beam CT acquired concurrent with rotational irradiation [ J ]. Radiother Oncol, 2011, 100(3): 365-369.
  • 10ZUCCA S, CARAU B, SOLLA I, et al. Prostate image-guided radiotherapy by megavolt cone-beam CT [ J ]. Strahlenther Onkol,201 I, 187(8): 473-478.

引证文献7

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部