污染排放约束下中国农业水资源效率的区域差异与影响因素被引量：99

Regional Disparity and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Water Resources Efficiency with the Constraint of Pollution

原文传递

导出

摘要应用数据包络分析(DEA)构建了非径向方向性距离函数模型,采用全要素水资源效率的测度思路,对污染排放约束下中国分省份及区域的农业水资源效率进行了测度,并采用Bootstrap断尾回归模型对污染排放下农业水资源效率的影响因素进行了实证研究。2011年、2012年全国平均农业水资源效率分别为0.693、0.671,全国一半以上的省份未达到生产前沿。在八大区域中,北部沿海和黄河中游地区的农业水资源效率最高,西北地区和东北地区的农业水资源效率处于低水平。在诸多影响因素中,农田水利建设和环境规制对于提升我国农业水资源效率具有显著的促进作用,而水资源丰裕程度则具有显著的负面影响。 Within the framework of DEA, the paper constructs a non-radial directional distance function to measure agricultural water resource efficiency in China with the total factor water efficiency measurement method. Then the bootstrap truncated regression method is used to investigate the influencing factors. The results show that the average agricultural wa- ter resource efficiency of China is respectively 0. 693 and 0. 671 in 2011 and 2012. Half of the provinces in China do not reach the production frontier. In the eight regions, the northern coastal region and the middle reaches of the Yellow River have high agricultural water efficiency, and the efficiency of northwest and northeast is at a low level. In the influencing factors, farmland water conservancy construction and environmental regulation can significantly improve agricultural water resource efficiency, while the water resource abundance has significantly negative effect.

作者杨骞刘华军

机构地区山东财经大学公共管理学院山东财经大学经济学院

出处《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期114-128,158,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

基金国家社科基金(12CJL066 13CJL069) 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013GM015) 山东省社会科学规划研究重大委托项目(14AWTJ01-12) 全国统计科研计划项目(2012LY120)的资助

关键词污染排放农业水资源效率非径向方向性距离函数数据包络分析 Pollutant Emission Agricultural Water Resource Efficiency Non-radial Directional Distance Function DEA

分类号 F303.1 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1Barros C.P., Managi - , Matousek t- , 2012, The Technical Efficiency of the Japanese Banks.. Non-radial Directional Performance Measurement with Undesirable Outputs [J]. Omega, 40 (1), 1-8.
2Chambers R. G. , Chung Y. , Fare R. , 1996, Benefit and Distance Functions [J]. Journal of E- conomic Theory, 70 (2), 407-419.
3Fare R. , Grosskopf S. , Pasurka C. A. , 2007, Environmental Production Functions and Environ- mental Directional Distance Functions [J]. Energy, 32 (7), 1055-1066.
4Fare R. , Grosskopf S- , 2010, Directional Distance Functions and Slacks-based Measure of E f fi ciency [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 200 (1), 320-322.
5Fukuyama H. , Weber W. L. , 2009, A Directional Slacks-based Measure of Technical Efficiency [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43 (4), 274-287.
6Fukuyama H. , Yoshida Y. , Managi S. , 2011, Modal Choice between Air and Rail: A Social Efficiency Benchmarking Analysis that Considers COz Emissions [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 13 (2), 89-102.
7Hu J. L. , Wang S.C. , Yeh F. Y. , 2006, Total-factor Water Efficiency of Regions in China [J]. Resources Policy, 31, 217-230.
8Kaneko S. , Tanaka K. , Toyota T. , 2004, Water Efficiency of Agricultural Production in Chi- na: Regional Comparison from 1999 to 2002 [J]. International Journal of Agricukural Resources, Govern- ance and Ecology, 3 (3-4), 231-251.
9Renzetti S. , Dupont D. P. , 2009, Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Municipal Water Sup- pliers.. The Role of Environmental Factors [J]. Land Economics, 85 (4), 627-636.
10Simar L. , Wilson P. W. , 2000, A General Methodology for Bootstrapping in Non-parametric Frontier Model [J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27 (6), 7794802.