摘要
通常情况下,德国民法中的债权人迟延和给付不能之间不会发生界定困难的问题。但是在部分案情中却会出现界定困难的问题。传统的"抽象模式"并不正确,界定债权人迟延和给付不能之间的唯一标准是给付的可补正性。而债权人迟延或给付不能的原因仅影响之后的法律效果。此点于绝对定期行为中亦可得到验证。
The difference between the creditor arrears ( Glubigerverzug ) and the impossibility of performance ( Unmglichkeit der Leistung)is usually clear,but in some cases it is indistinct.The traditional“Abstrahierungsformel”schould be not correct,the sole standard to distinguish the creditor arrears from the impossibility of performance is the possibility to continue to fulfil.The reasons of the creditor arrearsor the impossibility of performance only exert influence on the later legal consequences.This points can be verified in absolute regular behavior.
出处
《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2015年第1期32-35,共4页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词
债权人迟延
给付不能
绝对定期行为
the creditor arrears
the impossibility of performance
absolute fixed transaction