期刊文献+

经阴道彩色多普勒超声鉴别卵巢肿瘤的临床价值 被引量:5

Clinical Value of Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumor
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查在鉴别卵巢良性和恶性肿瘤方面的价值。方法:选取在我院就诊的卵巢肿瘤患者81例作为研究对象,所有对象术前均行经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查,以观察患者瘤内血流分级情况及肿瘤内动脉血流参数。结果:卵巢良性肿瘤组患者瘤内血流分级以0级和Ⅰ级为主,占90.00%,而卵巢恶性肿瘤组患者瘤内血流分级以Ⅲ级为主,占68.52%,与卵巢良性肿瘤组患者相比,卵巢恶性肿瘤组患者的血流分级明显升高;交界性肿瘤患者的瘤内血流分级以Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级为主,与卵巢良性肿瘤组患者比较有明显差异(P<0.05),与卵巢恶性肿瘤组患者相比无明显差异(P>0.05)。与卵巢良性肿瘤组患者相比,卵巢恶性肿瘤组患者的动脉血流阻力指数和搏动指数明显降低(P<0.05)。结论:血管分级、动脉血流阻力指数及波动指数有助于鉴别卵巢良性和恶性肿瘤。 Objective:To study the clinical value of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumor.Methods:A total of 81 patients with ovarian tumor were enrolled into this study in our hospital.Before operation,all the subjects were received the transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in order to detect parameters including the arterial vascular parameters and the vascular grading.Results:90.00% benign ovarian tumors were categorized as grade 0and gradeⅠ,while 68.52% malignant ovarian tumors were difined as hyper-vascularity(gradeⅢ).Significant differences were found in the vascular grading between the two groups.Most borderline tumors were categorized as gradeⅡ or gradeⅢ,which were similiar to malignant tumor(P〉0.05)but significantly different from the benign tumor(P〈0.05).Compared with those of the benign tumor,the artery resistance index and pulsation index of the malignant tumor was significant lower(P〈0.05).Conclusion:In clinical decisions,the artery resistance index,pulsation index,and the vascular grading are useful indicators for the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors.
出处 《武汉大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第6期893-895,共3页 Medical Journal of Wuhan University
基金 贵州省科技厅资助项目(编号:黔科合LS字[2012]001号)
关键词 卵巢肿瘤 经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查 临床价值 Ovary Tumors Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound Clinical Value
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1CARMELIET P,JAIN R K.Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases[J].Nature,2000,407(6801):249-257.
  • 2FOLKMAN J.Tumor angiogenisis[J].Adv Cancer Res,1985,43:175-203.
  • 3ANGEID BACKMAN E,COLEMAN B G,ARGER P H,et al.Comparison of resistive index versus pulsatility index in assessing the benign etiology of adnexal masses[J].Clin Imaging,1998,22(4):284-291.
  • 4KURJAK A,PREDANIC M,KUPESIC UREK S,et al.Transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler assessment of adnexal tumor vascularity[J].Gynecol Oncol,1993,50(1):3-9.
  • 5BENJAPIBAL M,SUNSANEEVITYAYAKUL P,BORIBOONHIRUNSARN D,et al.Color Doppler ultrasonography for prediction of malignant ovarian tumors[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2002,85(6):709-715.
  • 6Lee EJ, Kim SH, Kim YH, et al. Is CA-125 an additional help to radiologic findings for differentiation borderline ovarian tumor from stage I carcinoma? [J]. Aeta Radiol, 2011,52(4) :458-462.
  • 7Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Neeyalavira V, et al. E-flow doppler indices for prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2009 , 10(1) : 139-142.
  • 8Anderson CR, Hu X, Zhang H, et al. Ultrasound mo-lecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis with an integrin targeted microbubble contrast agent[J].Invest Radiol, 2011 ,46(4) :215-224.
  • 9Schomber T, Kopfstein L, Djonov V, et al. Placental growth factor-1 attenuates vascular endothelial growth factor-A-dependent tumor angiogenesis during beta cell carcinogenesis[J]. Cancer Res, 2007, 67 (22) : 10840- 10848.
  • 10Benjapibal M, Sunsaneevitayakul P, Boriboonhirunsarn D, et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography for prediction of malignant ovarian tumors [J].J Med Assoc Thai,2002, 85(6):709-715.

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部