期刊文献+

房地产企业债务期限结构及其优化研究——以沪深A股市场上市公司为例 被引量:3

The Debt Maturity Structure and Its Optimization of Real Estate Firms:An Empirical Research on Listed Companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于债务融资成本理论,以沪深证券市场A股房地产上市公司为研究样本,实证考察债务融资期限结构对企业价值的影响,进而探讨债务期限结构的优化以实现企业价值的提升。通过逐步回归模型的实证分析结果表明,房地产企业债务期限结构与企业价值之间呈倒U型关系,行业最优债务期限结构比例均值为36.4929%,且抽样分析检验给出的最优长期债务比例区间为34%-38%。 Based on the theory of debt financing cost,the Chinese A-share real estate listed enterprises in the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Markets are selected as samples to analyze the impact of debt maturity structure on corporate value,and then optimize the debt maturity structure in order to enhance the corporate value.The empirical analysis results of stepwise regression models show that there is a significant reverse U-shaped relationship between debt maturity structure and corporate value in real estate listed enterprises.The mean optimal ratio of debt maturity structure in real estate industry is 36.4929%,and the optimal long-term debt ratio range is35%-38%.
作者 郑慧开 谢赤
出处 《财经理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期65-69,共5页 The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71373072) 国家自然科学基金项目(71340014) 高等学校博士点专项科研基金项目(20130161110031)
关键词 房地产企业 债务期限结构 企业价值 优化 Real estate enterprise Debt maturity structure Corporate value Optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Cust6dio C, Ferreira M A, Laureano I.. Why are US firms u- sing more short-term debt? [J]. Journal of Financial Econom- ics, 2013, 108(1): 182-212.
  • 2Magri S. Debt maturity choice of nonpublic Italian firms[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010, 42(2-3) : 443- 463.
  • 3Goyal V. K, Wang W. Debt maturity and asymmetric informa- tion: evidence from default risk changes[J]. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 2013, 48(3): 789-817.
  • 4Diamond D. W, He Z. A theory of debt maturity:the long and short of debt overhang[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2014, 69 (2) ~ 719-762.
  • 5Datta S, Iskandar D. M, Raman K. Managerial stock owner- ship and the maturity structure o{ corporate debt[J]. Journal o{ Finance, 2005, 60(5): 2333-2350.
  • 6Guney Y, Ozkan A. New insights on the importance of agency costs for corporate debt maturity decisions[J]. Applied Finan- cial Economics Letters, 2005, 1(4) : 233-238.
  • 7Aslant O, Karan M. B. Ownership and control structure as determinants of corporate debt maturity~ A panel study of an e- merging market[J]. Corporate Governance, 2006, 14(4): 312 -324.
  • 8杨兴全,梅波.公司治理机制对债务期限结构的影响--来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].财贸研究,2008,19(1):134-140. 被引量:19
  • 9肖作平,廖理.大股东、债权人保护和公司债务期限结构选择——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].管理世界,2007,23(10):99-113. 被引量:111
  • 10姚明安,徐志平.管理层持股的治理效应——基于债务期限结构的视角[J].财经理论与实践,2008,29(5):49-54. 被引量:7

共引文献161

同被引文献24

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部