期刊文献+

经皮经导管射频消融去肾交感神经术治疗难治性高血压消融阻抗与疗效的关系 被引量:3

Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension:a 2-year follow-up report and the correlation between impedance during ablating and efficacy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察经皮经导管射频消融去肾交感神经术(RDN)对难治性(顽固性)高血压患者两年的降压效果及消融阻抗变化与疗效的关系。方法连续入选2011年10月至2013年3月中南大学湘雅三医院心内科连续收治的难治性高血压患者93例,其中6例因解剖原因排除(肾动脉为双支),45例为手术组,行RDN,48例为对照组,继续药物治疗,记录消融前及消融时30、60、90及120s平均阻抗的变化,监测患者术前及术后1、3、6、12、18及24月的血压,术前及术后12月行多排CT肾动脉造影检查,评价手术的有效性与安全性及消融阻抗下降幅度对疗效的影响。结果手术组32例及药物组30例完成2年随访,手术组术后平均收缩压及平均舒张压均有不同程度的下降,随访1、3、6、12、18、24月平均收缩压分别下降(19.4±4.1)、(22.3±4.4)、(23.2±5.1)、(23.4±4.9)、(24.3±3.8)、(28.3±4.9)mm Hg,平均舒张压分别下降(9.5±1.5)、(10.4±1.6)、(11.4±1.9)、(13.5±1.5)、(13.6±1.4)、(14.1±1.5)mm Hg,与术前基线及对照组同期比较,差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.01)。随访24月有近50%的患者收缩压〈140mm Hg。手术组按阻抗降低幅度分为3个亚组,阻抗下降10~20Ω组及≥20Ω组的平均收缩压及平均舒张压下降幅度明显超过≤10Ω组(均P〈0.05),10~20Ω及≥20Ω组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),7例无反应者中4例属于≤10Ω组。手术组术后血肌酐、肾小球滤过率与基线比较差异无统计学意义,多排CT肾动脉造影均未见肾动脉夹层及狭窄。结论 RDN能够显著和持久地降低难治性高血压患者的血压达到2年,手术安全有效,术中消融阻抗降低幅度〉10Ω可能与手术疗效相关。 Objective To explore the effect of renal sympathetic denervation(RDN)on blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension,and the correlation between impedance during ablating and efficacy. Methods Initially93 patients with resistant hypertension were consecutively enrolled from October 2011 to March 2013 for this study,and of them 6patients were excluded due to anatomical reasons mainly based on dual renal artery systems. Fortyfive patients underwent RDN and 48 patients continued to receive drugs treatment as the controls. Office mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure(SBP and DBP),serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate(GFR)were measured before and 1,3,6,12,18,24 months after the procedure. Three-dimensional renal artery imaging and 64-detector CT renal arteriography were performed before and 12 months after the procedure. Results After 24-month follow-up,there were respectively 32 and 30patients in the procedure and control groups with complete data. After1,3,6,12,18 and 24 months of the procedure,office mean SBP and DBP were significantly reduced by 19.4(standard deviation:4.1)and 9.5(1.5),22.3(4.4)and 10.4(1.6),23.2(5.1)and 11.4(1.9),23.4(4.9)and13.5(1.5),24.3(3.8)and 13.6(1.4),28.3(4.9)and 14.1(1.5)mm Hg,respectively,and these reductions were significant compared with their corresponding values at both baseline and in control group(P〈0.01). About half of studied subjects had SBP lower than 140 mm Hg after the 24-month follow-up. The procedure group was further categorized into three subgroups according to the reduction magnitude of impedance during ablating. Mean SBP and DBP were obviously lower in the subgroups with both 10-20Ωand ≥20Ωreductions in impedance than subgroup with≤10Ωreduction(P〈0.05),while no significance was attained between subgroups with 10-20and≥20Ωreductions(P〉0.05). Of seven patients with no response,4had impedance reduced≤10Ω. Serum creatinine and GFR did not differ significantly in both procedure and control groups compared with their baseline values(P〉0.05),and no renal artery dissection or stenosis was observed after 12 months of the procedure. Conclusion Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation can cause substantial and sustained blood pressure reduction during the2-year follow-up,and there was a possible correlation between the reduced impedance of more than 10 Ωduring ablating and efficacy of RDN.
出处 《中华高血压杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期945-951,共7页 Chinese Journal of Hypertension
基金 湖南省科技厅科技计划重点项目(2012WK2002)
关键词 高血压 导管消融术 去肾神经术 阻抗 Hypertension Ablation Renal sympathetic denervation Impedance
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, et al. Selected major risk fac- tors and global and regional burden of disease[J]. Lancet, 2002, 360(8) : 1347-1360.
  • 2Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data[J]. Lancet, 2005,365 (70) :217-223.
  • 3Dzau VJ, Amman EM, Black HR, et al. The cardiovascular dis ease continuum validated: clinical evidence of improved patient outcomes: part 1 : pathophysiology and clinical trial evidence (risk factors through stable coronary artery disease)[J]. Circulation, 2006,114(11) :2850-2870.
  • 4Sarafi dis PA, Bakris GL. Resistant hypertension: an overview of evaluation and treatment[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2008,52(12): 1749 -1757.
  • 5Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, et al. Resislant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association professional education committee of the council for high blood pressure research[J]. Circulation. 2008,117(9):510- 526.
  • 6Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitboum R, et al. Catheter based renalsympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of principle cohort study[J]. Lancet, 2009,373 (10) : 1275-1281.
  • 7Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitboum R, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (the Symplicity HTN-2 triad : a randomised controlled trial Symplicity HTN-2 investigators[J]. Lancet, 2010,376(9) : 1903-1909.
  • 8Krum H, Schlaich M, Schlaich P, et al. Percutaneous renal den ervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, final 3 year report of the Symplicity HTN-1 study[J]. Lancet, 2014,383 (10) :622-629.
  • 9江凤林,王新国,朱福音,曾丽雄,王晓艳,李慧,沈智洁,杨侃,张志辉.高血压犬经导管射频消融去肾交感神经术后血压及神经损伤因子的变化[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2014,39(3):245-251. 被引量:8
  • 10王丽,卢成志,张欣,罗迪,赵斌,于翔,夏大胜,陈欣,赵向东.经皮肾脏交感神经射频消融术对顽固性高血压患者肾素血管紧张系统的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2013,41(1):3-7. 被引量:17

二级参考文献45

  • 1Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R J, Brown TM, et al . Executive summary : heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2010,121 : e259.
  • 2Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension : analysis of worldwide data. Lancet, 2005,65 : 217- 223.
  • 3Jordan J. Sympathetic genes, baroreflexes, and hypertension. Clin Auton Res ,2004,14:369-375.
  • 4Grisk O, Rettig R. Interactions between the sympathetic nervous system and the kidneys in arterial hypertension. Cardiovasc Res, 2004,61:238-246.
  • 5Grassi G, Arenare F, Pieruzzi F, et al. Sympathetic activation in cardiovascular and renal disease. J Nephrol, 2009,22 : 190-195.
  • 6Smith PA, Graham LN, Mackintosh AF, et al. Relationship between central sympathetic activity and stages of human hypertension. Am J Hypertens, 2004,17:217-222.
  • 7Grimson KS. Total thoracic andpartial to total lumbar sympathectomy and celiac ganglionectomy in the treatment of hypertension. Ann Surg ,19gl ,114:753-775.
  • 8Knepper PA, Neudorff LG, Et A. Hypertension: surgical treatment by transthoracic thoracolumbar sympathectomy. Mo Med, 1949,46 : 855-860.
  • 9Li M, Galligan J, Wang D, et al. The effects of celiac ganglionectomy on sympathetic innervation to the splanchnic organs in the rat. Auton Neurosci, 2010,154:66-73.
  • 10King AJ, Osborn JW, Fink GD. Splanchnic circulation is a critical neural target in angiotensin II salt hypertension in rats. Hypertension, 2007,50:547-556.

共引文献43

同被引文献45

  • 1刘亚普,张新梅,王美玲,吴海霞.胱抑素C、血脂、血糖和肾功能联合检测在高血压血管性疾病临床应用中的价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):3143-3144. 被引量:4
  • 2Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data[J]. Lancet, 2005,365(9455):217-223.
  • 3Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2015,131(4): e29-322.
  • 4Ameta D, Pradhan AK, Sethi R. Renal sympathetic denervation a promising therapy for resistant hypertension[J]. Heart India 2014,2(1):3-10.
  • 5Sakakura K, Ladich E, Cheng Q, et al. Anatomic assessment of sympathetic peri-arterial renal nerves in man [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2014,64(7) :635-643.
  • 6Atherton DS, Deep NL, Mendelsohn FO. Micro-anatomy of the renal sympathetic nervous system: a human postmortem histologic study[J]. Clin Anat,2012,25(5) :628-633.
  • 7Olsen LK, Kamper AL, Svendsen JH, et al. Renal denervation [J]. Eur J Intern Med,2015,26(2) :95-105.
  • 8Davies JE, Manisty CH, Petraeo R, et al. First in man salety evaluation of renal denervation for chronic systolic heart failure: primary outcome from REACH-Pilot study[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013,162(3): 189-192.
  • 9Hering D, Mahfoud F, Walton AS, et al. Renal denervation in moderate to severe CKD[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol,2012,23(7):1250-1257.
  • 10Shantha GP, Pancholy SB. Effect of renal sympathetic denerva- tion on apnea hypopnea index in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Sleep Breath, 2015,19(1) :29-34.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部