期刊文献+

新鲜全血在不同血细胞分析仪比对及偏倚评估中的应用 被引量:6

Application of fresh whole blood in comparison and bias estimation between different hematocyte analyzers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对2台不同品牌的血细胞分析仪的检测结果进行方法学比对及偏倚评估。方法以Sysmex XE-2100血细胞分析仪为参考仪器,Abbott CD-1700血细胞分析仪为比对仪器。选择新鲜全血样本40份,检测白细胞计数(WBC)、红细胞计数(RBC)、血红蛋白(HGB)、红细胞比容(HCT)、红细胞平均体积(MCV)、红细胞平均血红蛋白量(MCH)、红细胞平均血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)及血小板计数(PLT),计算相关系数(r)、线性回归方程及相对偏倚,判断2台血细胞分析仪检测结果的可比性。结果 2台血细胞分析仪的精密度好。在使用新鲜全血为校准品时,2台仪器检测的8个项目的r均大于0.975,相对偏倚均在可接受范围内。结论 2台血细胞分析仪测定结果具有可比性,用新鲜全血对不同血细胞分析仪进行比对试验,能及时发现仪器间的系统误差。 Objective To compare the detection results and estimate the bias of two hematocyte analyzers of different brands.Methods Sysmex XE-2100 hematocyte analyzer and Abbott CD-1700 hematocyte analyzer were chosen to be the reference instrument and comparison instrument,respectively.40 cases of fresh whole blood samples were collected for the detection of WBC,RBC,HGB,HCT,MCV,MCH,MCHC,and PLT respectively by the two instruments.The correlation coefficient(r),regression equations and bias were calculated and compared to determine the comparability of the two instruments.Results The precisions of two hematocyte analyzers were satisfactory.When fresh whole blood was used as calibrators,the results of all eight items of the two instruments had good correlations(r〉0.975),and the relative bias was acceptable.Conclusion The results of two hematocyte analyzers are comparable.With fresh whole blood using in the comparison test between different hematocyte analyzers,systematic errors can be discovered in time.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第22期3099-3101,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 血细胞分析仪 比对 偏倚 hematocyte analyzer comparison bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献32

共引文献70

同被引文献41

  • 1张莉,吴炯,郭玮,潘柏申.医学检验检测系统应用前的性能评价[J].检验医学,2006,21(6):560-563. 被引量:71
  • 2梅敏,帅虎,李海珠,梁洁玲.血细胞分析仪的校准与质控[J].现代检验医学杂志,2007,22(1):120-122. 被引量:11
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.WS/T 406-2012临床血液学检验常规项目分析质量要求[S].2012.
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.WS/T407-2012医疗机构内定量检验结果的可比性验证指南[S].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2012.
  • 5尚红,王毓三,申子瑜.全国临床检验操作规程[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2014:86-108.
  • 6CLSI. EP9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation u- sing patient samples.. Approved guideline [ S]. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2002.
  • 7Takubo T,Tatsumi N,Satoh N,et al.Evaluation of hema- tological values obtained with reference automated hema- tology analyzers of six manufacturers[J].Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health,2002,33(Suppl 2):62-67.
  • 8CLSI.EP9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation u- sing patient samples[S],2nd ed.Wayne PA:CLSI,2002.
  • 9England JM1Rowan RM,Van Assendelft OW,et al.Pro- tocol for evaluation of automated blood cell counters.In- ternational Committee for Standardization in Haematolo- gy (ICSH)[J].Clin Lab Haematol,1984,6(1):69-84.
  • 10刘艳,马晓露,王秀伟,盖生久.血细胞分析仪比对实验应用的评价探讨[J].大连医科大学学报,2008,30(4):387-389. 被引量:7

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部