期刊文献+

修订版控制态度量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:19

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Control Attitudes Scale-Revised
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 引进修订版控制态度量表(Control Attitudes Scale-Revised,CAS-R)并测定其中文版信效度.方法 使用CAS-R量表对125例心内科住院的心脏病患者进行感知控制力测定,并对测定结果进行信效度分析.结果 CAS-R量表重测信度为0.825,分半信度为0.512,整个量表的Cronbach α系数为0.874,各维度的Cronbach α系数在0.735~0.862;因子分析共提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为54.128%,且各条目在其公因子上的因子载荷均大于0.4;采用贝克抑郁量表(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI)做效标效度,CAS-R得分与BDI得分的Pearson相关系数为-0.59,与BDI 3个维度自我效能感、心理控制源和习得无助感的Pearson相关系数分别为-0.48、-0.51和0.42.结论 CAS-R中文版具有较好的信效度,适合评价心脏病患者的感知控制力. Objective To translate the English version of Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CAS-R in patients with heart disease.Methods Totally 125 patients with heart disease were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of CAS-R.Results The internal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version of CAS-R ranged from 0.735 to 0.862.Factor analysis got three factors,which explained 54.128% of the total variance.Using BDI as an external criterion,the correlation coefficients of the CAS-R and BDI scores were-0.59.Pearson coefficient with three dimensions of BDI were-0.48、-0.51 and 0.42.Conclusions The Chinese version of CAS-R has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used as a valid tool for the measurement of perceived control in patients with heart disease.
机构地区 河南省人民医院
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第31期73-76,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 修订版控制态度量表 心脏病 效度 信度 Control Attitudes Scale-Revised Heart disease Validity Reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献72

共引文献111

同被引文献221

引证文献19

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部