期刊文献+

全日制体育硕士专业学位研究生教育服务质量评价——基于SERVQUAL模型 被引量:7

Research on the Education Service Quality of Full-time Professional Master of Sports——Based on the SERVQUAL Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用访谈法、问卷调查法以及数理统计等方法,以质量评价的差距理论和SERVQUAL模型评价方法为依据,从学生感知服务质量的角度来分析全日制体育硕士专业学位研究生教育质量保障,通过多层面调查基础上设计出了包括效果性、可靠性、价值性、保证性、关怀性和品牌性6个一级指标及其相对应的23个二级指标的全日制体育硕士专业学位研究生教育服务质量评价体系,通过检验具有较高的信度和效度.对全国20所高校学生的调查研究表明:全日制体育硕士专业学位研究生对教育服务质量的期望和感知的平均值较高,但实际感知与期望还有差距;当前的全日制体育硕士专业学位研究生教育服务质量不能完全满足学生的期望,总体水平还有待提高. Using the methods of interview, questionnaire, mathematical statistics and accord- ing to the quality evaluation of the gap between theory and SERVQUAL model evaluation method, this thesis analyses education quality assurance of the full-time professional master of sports from the perspective of students' perception of service quality. Through multi-levels investigation including six first level indictors such as effectiveness, reliability, value, assurance, care and brand, and 23 second level indexes, this thesis designs the quality evaluation system of the education service of full-time professional master of sports, and the evaluation system is proved to has good reliability and validity. The empirical study for the students from 20 universities indicate : The full-time profes- sional masters of sports have a comparatively high average value of expectation and perception of ed- ucation service, but there is still disparity between the actual perception and expectation. Generally speaking fore, it , The current education service can't fully satisfy the expectations of the students. There- has yet be improved.
出处 《福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期117-124,共8页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(12CTY023) 福建师范大学优秀青年骨干教师培养基金(fjsdjx2012010)
关键词 全日制 体育硕士专业 学位研究生 教育服务质量 SERVQUAL量表 full-time master of sports professional degree graduate the education servicequality SERVQUAL scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1林森,白世国.高师院校学生评价教师教学质量指标体系的研究[J].现代教育科学(高教研究),2004(3):73-77. 被引量:8
  • 2胡子祥.高等教育服务质量评价模型研究[J].现代大学教育,2006,22(2):61-67. 被引量:62
  • 3顾佳峰.高等教育服务质量研究——以北京大学为例[J].黑龙江高教研究,2006,24(6):5-10. 被引量:29
  • 4沈勇.教育服务质量感知维度探索[J].高等工程教育研究,2007,55(2):98-102. 被引量:14
  • 5GREEN D.What is quality in higher education?//The society for research into higher education.Buckingham:Open University Press,1994:3-21.
  • 6ANDERSON E.High tech v.high touch:a case study of TQM implementation in higher education[J].Managing Service Quality,1995,5 (2):48-56.
  • 7KWAN P Y K.Quality indicators in higher education-comparing Hong Kong and China's students[J].Managerial Auditing Journal,1999,14(1/2):20-27.
  • 8O'NEILL M A,PALMER A.Importance-performance analysis:a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education[J].Quality Assurance in Education,2004,12(1):39-52.
  • 9吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版,2001..
  • 10Parasuraman, A., et al. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality [J]. Journal of Retailing. 64, (1), 1988: 12-40.

共引文献85

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部