期刊文献+

腔镜深筋膜下交通静脉离断联合小腿曲张静脉直视透光旋切术治疗活动性下肢静脉溃疡的早期疗效研究 被引量:5

Early stage effect comparison of lower limb venous ulcer(C6) treatment by combination of SEPS and Trivex system to SEPS
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较单纯腔镜深筋膜下交通静脉离断术(SEPS)与SEPS联合小腿曲张静脉直视透光旋切术(Trivex术)治疗活动性下肢静脉溃疡的早期效果。方法选择2009年1月至2012年12月入院的下肢静脉溃疡患者156例,按住院号单、双将患者分为试验组(SEPS+Trivex术)和对照组(SEPS术)。比较两组患者术后第1、3、6个月溃疡愈合、复发、下肢肿痛及局部皮肤麻木等并发症的发生率。结果术后1个月两组患者的溃疡愈合率差异无统计学意义,试验组术区肿痛及麻木感均显著高于对照组(26.3%vs 11.2%,23.8%vs 10.1%,P<0.05),无患者溃疡复发;术后3个月试验组患者的溃疡愈合率高于对照组(80.0%vs 66.3%,P<0.05),术区肿痛稍低于对照组(5.0%vs 5.6%),差异无统计学意义,麻木高于对照组(12.5%vs 3.4%,P<0.05);术后6个月试验组患者的溃疡愈合率高于对照组(91.3%vs 79.8%,P<0.05),试验组及对照组术后6个月术区肿痛发生率分别为3.8%及2.4%,差异无统计学意义,术区麻木消失。术后第6个月试验组静脉溃疡复发率低于对照组(1.25%vs 7.87%,P<0.05)。两组患者术中及随访期间均未出现死亡病例,未发生深静脉血栓形成等严重并发症。结论虽然SEPS+Trivex术后短期(1~3个月)轻微并发症的发生率较高,但在术后早期(6个月内)静脉溃疡治愈率更高,复发率更低,因此更适合下肢静脉溃疡的治疗。 Objective To compare the early stage treatment effect of lower limb venous ulcer (C6) by subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) to SEPS and Trivex system. Methods According to singular or even hospital number, one hundred and fifty-six patients of venous ulcer in lower limb adopted from January 2009 to December 2012 were divided into two groups. Experimental group:singular hospital number, treated by combination of SEPS and Trivex system, saphenous vein ligation and stripping, percutaneous and continuous venule circumsuture at the same time;control group:even hospital number, treated by SEPS, and saphenous vein ligation and stripping, percutaneous and continuous venule circumsuture. Results In the first month, the healing rate in two groups had no statistically significant differences;pain and numbness in experimental group was much higher than control group (26.3%vs 11.2%, 23.8%vs 10.1%, P〈 0.05). There was no ulcer recurrence in the two groups. In the third month, the healing rate in experimental group was much higher than control group (80.0%vs 66.3%, P〈0.05) , and numbness in experimental group was much higher than control group (12.5%vs 3.4%, P〈0.05). In the sixth month, the healing rate in experimental group was higher than control group (91.3%vs 79.8%, P 〈0.05) . No patient felt pain and numbness. The recurrent rate of ulcer in experimental group was lower than control group (1.25%vs 7.87%, P〈 0.05). All patients in the two groups had no serious complications, but subcutaneous hematoma and skin numbness after operation was much higher than control group in the first month (P〈0.05), and became the same in the sixth month. Conculsion Though the slight complications of experimental group such as subcutaneous hematoma and skin numbness after operation are much higher than SEPS group in the first to third month, combination of Trivex system with SEPS is a better way to treat venous ulcerv (C6) in lower limb for a higher healing rate and a lower recurrence rate.
出处 《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》 2014年第5期56-59,共4页 Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 静脉溃疡 Trivex术 SEPS术 Venous ulcer Trivex Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Taylor RR, Sladkevicius E, Guest JF. Modelling the cost- effectiveness of electric stimulation therapy in non-healing venous leg ulcers[J]. J Wound Care, 2011, 20(10): 468-472.
  • 2Labropoulos N, Wang ED, Lanier ST, et al. Factors associated with poor healing and recurrence of venous ulceration[J], iPlast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 129(1): 179-186.
  • 3Kurdal AT, Cerrahoglu M, Iskesen I, et al. Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery ameliorates the symptoms of ch::onic venous ulcer(C6)patients[J]. Int Angiol, 2010, 29(1): 70-74.
  • 4Cheshire N, Elias SM, Keagy B, et al. Powered phlebectomy (TriVex) in treatment of varicose veins[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2002, 16(4): 488-494.
  • 5Harlander-Locke M, Jimenez JC, Lawrence PF, e: al. Endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebeetomy is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic patients with axial reflux and large incompetent tributaries[J]. J Vase Surg, 2033, 58(1): 166-172.
  • 6Wong IK, Andriessen A, Lee DT, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers[J]. J Eur Aea Dermatol Venereol, 2012, 2,5(1): 102-110.
  • 7Harlander-Locke M, Lawrence PF, Alktaifi A, et al. The impact of ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins on ulcer healing rates[J]. J Vase Surg, 2012, 55(2): 458-464.
  • 8van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(3): 563- 571.
  • 9Baffoni M, Bessa LJ, Grande R, et al. Laser irradiation effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofdms isolated from venous leg ulcer[J]. Int Wound J, 2012, 9(5): 517- 524.
  • 10常光其,殷恒讳,李晓曦,陈磊,叶润仪,王深明.复发性静脉性溃疡的原因分析及再处理方法[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(6):500-502. 被引量:16

二级参考文献18

  • 1王深明.下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全的外科治疗[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(6):629-631. 被引量:26
  • 2Sándor T.Pathomechanism of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcer.Acta Phvsiol Hum;.2004.91 -131-145.
  • 3Kavuturu S,Cirishkumar H,Ehrlich F.Endovenous laser ablation of saphenous vein is an effective treatment modality for lower extremity varicose veins.Am Surg,2006,72:672-675.
  • 4Sybrandy JE,van Gent WB,Pierik EG,et al.Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration:long-term follow-up.J Vase Surg,2001,33:1028-1032.
  • 5Tassiopoulos AK,Gohs E,Oh DS,et al.Current concepts in chronic venous ulceration.Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg,2000,20:227-232.
  • 6Milic DJ,Zivic SS,Bogdanovic DC,et al.The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy.J Vasc Surg,2010,51:655-661.
  • 7Taylor RR, Sladkevicius E, Guest JF. Modelling the cost- effectiveness of electric stimulation therapy in non-healing venous leg ulcers[J]. J Wound Care, 2011, 20(10): 468-472.
  • 8Labropoulos N, Wang ED, Lanier ST, et al. Factors associated with poor healing and recurrence of venous ulceration[J], iPlast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 129(1): 179-186.
  • 9Kurdal AT, Cerrahoglu M, Iskesen I, et al. Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery ameliorates the symptoms of ch::onic venous ulcer(C6)patients[J]. Int Angiol, 2010, 29(1): 70-74.
  • 10Cheshire N, Elias SM, Keagy B, et al. Powered phlebectomy (TriVex) in treatment of varicose veins[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2002, 16(4): 488-494.

共引文献19

同被引文献36

  • 1Taylor RR, Sladkevicius E, Guest JF. Modelling the cost- effectiveness of electric stimulation therapy in non-healing venous leg ulcers[J]. J Wound Care, 2011, 20(10): 468-472.
  • 2Labropoulos N, Wang ED, Lanier ST, et al. Factors associated with poor healing and recurrence of venous ulceration[J], iPlast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 129(1): 179-186.
  • 3Kurdal AT, Cerrahoglu M, Iskesen I, et al. Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery ameliorates the symptoms of ch::onic venous ulcer(C6)patients[J]. Int Angiol, 2010, 29(1): 70-74.
  • 4Cheshire N, Elias SM, Keagy B, et al. Powered phlebectomy (TriVex) in treatment of varicose veins[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2002, 16(4): 488-494.
  • 5Harlander-Locke M, Jimenez JC, Lawrence PF, e: al. Endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebeetomy is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic patients with axial reflux and large incompetent tributaries[J]. J Vase Surg, 2033, 58(1): 166-172.
  • 6Wong IK, Andriessen A, Lee DT, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers[J]. J Eur Aea Dermatol Venereol, 2012, 2,5(1): 102-110.
  • 7Harlander-Locke M, Lawrence PF, Alktaifi A, et al. The impact of ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins on ulcer healing rates[J]. J Vase Surg, 2012, 55(2): 458-464.
  • 8van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(3): 563- 571.
  • 9Baffoni M, Bessa LJ, Grande R, et al. Laser irradiation effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofdms isolated from venous leg ulcer[J]. Int Wound J, 2012, 9(5): 517- 524.
  • 10张鹏,郭曙光,周兴立,方伟,尹存平,陈翠菊.溃疡周围缝扎术治疗慢性阻塞性静脉功能不全并发的下肢溃疡[J].中华普通外科杂志,2009,24(11):908-910. 被引量:2

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部