摘要
近年來,出版了四種整理本《毛詩注疏》:一是北大本,整理者是龔抗雲、李傳書、胡漸逵;二是臺灣本,整理者是周何;三是《儒藏》本,整理者是鄭傑文、孔德淩;四是上古本,整理者是朱傑人、李慧玲。通過以下八個方面的對比,即一,底本的選擇;二,通校本的選擇;三,對阮元《校勘記》的認識;四,對前人校勘成果的吸收;五,失校和誤校;六,標點的破句;七,引號的使用;八,北京大學出版社繁體字本平議,從而得出結論:上述四本之中,由朱傑人、李慧玲整理的上古本是最佳整理本。當然,上古本也不是盡善盡美,仍有提高的空間。
Recently four collated versions of MaoshiZhushu(《毛詩注疏》)have been published:Beida version rectified by Gong Kangyun,Li Chuanshu and Hu Jiankui;Taiwan version by Zhou He;Ruzangversion by ZhengJiewen and Kong Deling;Shanggu version by Zhu Jieren and Li Huiling. Based on the comparison in eight ways(the choice of original text,the choice of reference text,the understanding of Ruan Yuan's notes of collation,the absorption of previous collations,the missing collation and wrong collation,the error punctuation,the use of quotation marks and the comments on traditional character version by Beida),in these four versions Shanggu version by Zhu Jieren and Li Huiling is the bestalthough it is to be improved.
出处
《中华文史论丛》
CSSCI
2014年第4期289-371,共83页
Journal of Chinese Literature and History
基金
作者主持的國家社科基金項目<孔穎達〈五經正義〉中疏與注的關係研究>階段成果之一
項目批准號:14BZS007