期刊文献+

LEEP刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变临床疗效观察

Clinical observation of LEEP knife treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨LEEP刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的临床疗效。方法将2008年11月至2013年3月在我院妇产科就诊的309例CIN患者分为两组,其中观察组179例采用环行电切术(LEEP刀)治疗、对照组130例采用冷刀锥切术治疗,观察比较两组患者的术中情况及临床疗效。结果观察组患者的平均手术时间、术中出血量、愈合时间、住院时间及总住院费用等均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的临床效果及术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 LEEP刀是一种治疗CIN的安全、有效方法,值得在临床上推广应用。 Objective Study on the clinical efficacy of LEEP knife treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN).Methods From November 2008 to March 2013,treated in hospital of Gynecology and obstetrics,309 cases of CIN were divided into two groups,179 in the observation group were treated with Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure(LEEP knife)in the treatment,control group of 130 cases with cold knife conization treatment,observe all patients during operation and clinical curative effect.Results Observe group average operating time、Intraoperative bleeding、union time、hospitalization time and total hospital costs are significantly lower than control group,there was a statistically significant difference(P〈0.05);The clinical effect of two groups of patients and postoperative complication rate compared,no significant difference(P〉0.05).Conclusion LEEP knife is a safe and effective method of treatment of CIN,deserve used in clinical practice.
作者 艾民
出处 《中国冶金工业医学杂志》 2014年第6期629-630,共2页 Chinese Medical Journal of Metallurgical industry
关键词 LEEP 宫颈上皮内瘤变 疗效观察 LEEP Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1金英杰,陈玲,凌学民.LEEP在宫颈上皮内瘤样病变诊治中的作用附120例近期临床观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2005,26(7):782-782. 被引量:3
  • 2Martin Hirsch PL, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[ J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, 2010,6 : CD001318.
  • 3Chan KK, Tam KF, Tse KY, et al. The use of vaginal antimicrobial after large loop excision of transformation zone: a prospective randomised trial [ J ]. An International Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, 2007,114(8) :970 -976.
  • 4Natee J, Therasakvichaya S, Bfibnhirunsarn D. Prevalenceand risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequenthysterectomy following LEEP or conization [ J ]. J Med Assoc Tha, 2005, 88 (10) : 1344 - 1348.
  • 5Jakobsson M, Gissler M,Paavonen J, et al. I.oop electrosurgical excisionprocedure and the risk for preterm birth[ J]. Obstetrics Gynecology, 2009,114(3) :504 -510.
  • 6Kalliala I, Anttila A, Pukkala E. Risk of cervical and other cancers after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: retrospective cohort study: retrospective cohort study [ J ]. British Medical Journal, 2005,331 (7526) :1183 - 1185.
  • 7Gonzalez DIJr,Zahn CM, Retzloff MG, et al. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,184(3) :315 -321.
  • 8Greenspan DL, Faubion M. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy[ J ]. Obstetrics Gynecology, 2007,110(3) :675 -680.
  • 9Jeong NH, Lee NW, Kim H J, et al. High-risk human papillomavirus testing for monitoring patients treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [ J ]. Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology Research, 2009,35 (4) :706 -711.
  • 10Fuste P, Bellosillo B. HPV determination in the control after leep due tocin Ⅱ - Ⅲ : prospective study and predictive model[J ]. In-temational Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 2009, 28 ( 2 ) : 120 - 126.

共引文献249

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部